[cdi-dev] CDI SE Google Doc Updated

John D. Ament john.d.ament at gmail.com
Tue Mar 17 05:49:53 EDT 2015


On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:50 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com> wrote:

> It's ok to have the same default bean discovery mode in Java SE.
> However, I think there is no easy way to scan the classpath and "detect"
> bean archives without beans.xml, i.e. implicit bean archives without the
> descriptor.
>

You should be able to read java.class.path to determine the possible
archives.  Then use the URL of the class itself to find which JAR it came
from.


>
> That's the reason why bean archives without beans.xml are not supported
> in Weld SE.
>
> If anyone knows how to implement this properly, speak out.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 17.3.2015 v 07:22 Jozef Hartinger napsal(a):
> >
> > On 03/16/2015 05:45 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 16 mars 2015 à 11:02, Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com
> >>> <mailto:jharting at redhat.com>> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Btw was there any further discussion about the bean discovery mode in
> SE
> >>>
> >>
> >> For the time being we decided to have the same discovery mode in SE
> >> (default to Annotated). If someone has a good reason to change the
> >> default mode in SE and/or add a new discovery mode, I’d be glad to
> >> hear about it.
> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2015-March/006334.html
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 03/16/2015 10:45 AM, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
> >>>> The CDIProvider serves as a kind of SPI for CDI's static methods to
> >>>> be able to call into the implementation. I don't think reusing it
> >>>> also as a user-facing code is a good idea. What people suggesting to
> >>>> reuse CDIProvider had in mind, I think, was to reuse it as the SPI
> >>>> for talking to the CDI implementation instead. That way, the
> >>>> initialize() static method of CDIContainer/StartedCDI/whatever we
> >>>> call it can use CDIProvider internally to actually start the
> container.
> >>>>
> >>>> In addition, the current proposal does not make it possible to
> >>>> implement parallel container instances.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jozef
> >>>>
> >>>> On 03/15/2015 05:03 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >>>>> HI all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Apologies for being a week late on getting this doc together.  I
> >>>>> had some personal issues pop up after my leg came out of its cast
> >>>>> that consumed most of my week last week.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anywho, I've updated the doc with a summary of what was discussed
> >>>>> with CDI SE bootstrap support.  You can find that here:
> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LgsGT-
> AAlrF72Z5pW4xNQiVjUHGUME46ZmB-wwF35Yw/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are two minor changes that I made from where we last
> >>>>> discussed, as when I was putting together code I found some gaps
> >>>>> and figured it best to fix them here than later.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. CDIProvider does not implement AutoCloseable.  Since CDI class
> >>>>> maintains a reference to the provider, implementing AutoCloseable
> >>>>> was not adding anything.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2. I added a method boolean isInitialized() so that the caller can
> >>>>> know if they need to start the container (or if it's already
> running).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Locally, I've also modified the CDI.current() method to use
> >>>>> getCDIProvider() instead of internally finding the provider since
> >>>>> we now have a getter.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One thing I'd like to get feedback on is if calling
> >>>>> initialize/shutdown in a container should throw
> >>>>> IllegalStateException, or probably better to throw
> >>>>> UnsupportedOperationException when called in EE containers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Let me know your thoughts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> John
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/
> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list,
> the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights
> inherent in such information.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/
> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list,
> the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights
> inherent in such information.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>
> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> >>> the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> >>> ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> >>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/
> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list,
> the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights
> inherent in such information.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/
> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list,
> the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights
> inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150317/eea065e2/attachment.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list