[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-518) Clarify boundaries of the ServletContext event

Mark Struberg (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Fri Mar 20 08:39:18 EDT 2015


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052157#comment-13052157 ] 

Mark Struberg commented on CDI-518:
-----------------------------------

Oki, getting tricky now. I think we should take a step back and finally do our homework regarding EAR handling.

* What classes are seen where. 
* How do we handle/deal with isolation and visibility constraints of CDI running in EARs. 
* How does Extension visibility look like
* Which classes should get delivered to which Extension
* getBeans in EARs
* @Named in EARs (thats a TOTAL mess right now)
* getInterceptors, decorators etc in EARs
...

After that the observer resolution will solve itself pretty quickly.

> Clarify boundaries of the ServletContext event
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-518
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-518
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>          Components: Events
>            Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
>
> {quote}
> An event with qualifier @Initialized(ApplicationScoped.class) is fired when the application
> context is initialized and an event with qualifier @Destroyed(ApplicationScoped.class) is fired
> when the application is destroyed. The event payload is:
> • the ServletContext if the application is a web application deployed to a Servlet container, or Conversation context lifecycle
> • any java.lang.Object for other types of application.
> {quote}
> Unlike dependency injection, the spec does not define any visibility boundaries for events. It could therefore be implied that in an EAR a web application could observe the ServletContext event for a different web application. This obviously does not seem right and the spec should explicitly define the expected behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)



More information about the cdi-dev mailing list