[cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-527 / PR 271 allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods

[José Paumard]

-1

For me it looks like setting implementation details in the specification, a
really wrong idea imho.

Plus, what does "proxy" mean ? We need to define the term in the spec. Does
it refer to java.lang.Proxy ? We all know that this class has been written
a long time ago, it has poor performance, and has already submitted
replacements based on MethodHandle and INDY.

José


2016-02-11 12:09 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:

> +1
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>



-- 
Java le soir <http://blog.paumard.org> Cours Java en ligne
<http://blog.paumard.org/cours-tutoriaux/>
Twitter <http://twitter.com/#!/JosePaumard> Paris JUG
<http://www.parisjug.org>
M : +33 6 76 82 91 47
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160212/f8238e3e/attachment.html