[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-584) Clarification needed on Set mutability returned by SPI
Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Fri Feb 19 09:58:00 EST 2016
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165820#comment-13165820 ]
Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-584:
------------------------------------------
Good catch. Error was on purpose to check your attention ;)... Ok, bad version pasted.
We should have
{code}
Set<InjectionPoint> ips = bean.getInjectionPoints();
{code}
I create the ticket for addition to {{ProcessBean}}
> Clarification needed on Set mutability returned by SPI
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-584
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-584
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Portable Extensions
> Reporter: Antoine Sabot-Durand
>
> {{ProcessBean}} lifecycle event could be the occasion to add new Injection point to an existing bean, but when you call {{ProcessBean#getBean()#getInjectionPoints()}} the returned set is mutable in OWB and immutable in Weld.
> As the spec doesn't precise if the Set should be mutable or not, each impl made its own choice.
> The result is a lack of consistency between both impl and an interesting feature harder to do with Weld (work with AnnotatedType or create a custom bean to add injection point)
> More generally we should clarify mutability of each Set returned in the SPI. And check if it wouldn't be better to add method to life cycle event to provide a "temporary" mutable set (i.e. {{ProcessBean#getInjectionPoints()}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list