[cdi-dev] Concurrency Control

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

At apache we have subprojects which can become top level project if they
behaves well. Would it be possible at EE level? Idea would be to have
cdi-concurrency subspec (under CDI umbrella but not part of CDI itself -
know there was appendix in bval for instance). Then for EE 9 if the subspec
is proven as good it would become its own spec. wdyt?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2016-02-28 19:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>:

>
> > Am 26.02.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Werner Keil <werner.keil at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Reza/all,
> >
> > One of the biggest problems with Concurrency Utilities is, that it
> started in 2003, then went "dormant" (before the term existed) and was
> revived to be finalized 10 years later after little or no proper alignment
> with then state of the art Java EE standards and technologies. It
> duplicates things, especially in EJB or CDI.
> >
>
> +1 that pretty much sums it up. Concurrency utils is pretty much broken
> and unusable as it is today.  :/
>
> Anyway, let’s not fight the past - we need a way forward.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160228/f3a90785/attachment.html