[cdi-dev] pull requests broken?

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

It's been the default branch on Github since the end of EDR1. There's a 2
branch for the TCK as well.

Le sam. 16 janv. 2016 à 11:50, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> a écrit :

> Oki txs.
>
> Is 2.0-EDR2 now the official work branch for time time coming?
> I cannot find any mail nor log where this got discussed or announced. Did
> I miss something?
>
> How does it look like for the CDI-TCK? Which branch to use for it?
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 16.01.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net>:
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > There was nothing done recently on the repo. The last big change was my
> request to make it the main repo (it was mark as a fork of Ales before
> that), but it was 2 years ago.
> > You should add the remote again on your local repo.
> > Don't forget to make your PR on 2.0-EDR2 branch.
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> > Le sam. 16 janv. 2016 à 10:51, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> a
> écrit :
> > hi folks!
> >
> > I cannot send a pull-request anymore. Only got pete and ales in the fork
> upstream network list. The official cdi-spec repo is gone from my list. The
> sha1 chain is fine though.
> > Got this broken by some tinkering with the official repo or is github
> broken?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160116/711168c5/attachment-0001.html