[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-579) Extension disqualifies a jar as 'implicit bean archive'?

[Mark Struberg (JIRA)]

Mark Struberg created CDI-579:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Extension disqualifies a jar as 'implicit bean archive'?
                 Key: CDI-579
                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-579
             Project: CDI Specification Issues
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Mark Struberg
            Priority: Minor


The bean-discovery-wording is a bit odd. 
This has been in since CDI-1.1
{code}
An archive which:
• contains a beans.xml file with the bean-discovery-mode of none, or,
• contains an extension and no beans.xml file is not a bean archive.
is not a bean archive.
{code}

That means even if you have an @ApplicationScoped MyService class in a jar which has a single CDI Extension then this MyServices will *not* get picked up as CDI bean? At least according to this wording?
Feels mega-weird to me and might conflict with the implicit beans archive definition a few lines below.

I'm pretty sure in OWB we will pick those beans up. How does Weld behave?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)