[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-420) add a bean-discovery-mode 'scoped'

[Emily Jiang (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13248972#comment-13248972 ] 

Emily Jiang commented on CDI-420:
---------------------------------

I am a bit confused. I thought this discussion is to include some classes that are not beans in the implicit bean archives. In Martin's suggestion, it is to exclude classes. Do you mean "include" or I might have missed something?

> add a bean-discovery-mode 'scoped'
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-420
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-420
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Packaging and Deployment
>    Affects Versions: TBD
>            Reporter: Mark Struberg
>             Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
>
>
> This is for some future CDI release.
> We currently only have 3 bean-discovery-modes
> * none
> * all
> * annotated
> The spec also currently says that ProcessAnnotatedType will only get fired (12.4) for 
> • each Java class, interface or enum deployed in an explicit bean archive, and 
> • each Java class with a bean defining annotation in an implicit bean archive. 
> • each session bean
> Which means that we do not get the ProcessAnnotatedType (PAT) event for any class in an 'annotated' or 'implicit' BDA which does _not_ have a bean defining annotation. 
> It might be useful to fire the ProcessAnnotatedType for all classes, but do not pick them up as Beans if they (after PAT) do not have a valid scope. Effectively doing the processing but not make them @Dependent automatically if there is no scope annotation at the end of the PAT processing.
> I'm not yet 100% sure how important this distinction is in practice. Just writing this up to not forget about the idea...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)