[cdi-dev] New version for CDI bootstrap

[Martin Kouba]

Dne 20.6.2016 v 12:30 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> If your'e using container builder, I would call it "container" instead
> of CDISE.  Even if we switch to initializer or configurator, this should
> become the container class.

Emily had a good point during mtg that the name Container is a bit 
overused (just try to open Container class in your IDE). So 
StandaloneContainer or CDIContainer or UserContainer might be a better 
choice...

>
> I'm in favor of this being its own spec jar, and really anything that is
> SE specific going there.  If we end up with something that is web
> specific, we should consider moving that out as well.

+1

>
> All other issues I see are commented in the PR.  Looks like we're really
> close.
>
> I'm not going to be able to attend tomorrows meeting, unfortunately, but
> still wanted to see if we could coordinate a real time chat around CDI-30.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:48 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand
> <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi guys,
>
>     I posted modification on PR 290 [1] according to last meeting.
>
>     I still have 2 points that stays open for me (you may have more) :
>
>     - Place and name of the package: should we decide to package SE
>     support in a specific jar, it will be probably better to have a
>     better package name at a higher level
>
>     - Name for CDISE class. Perhaps using Container or SeContainer
>       would be better. WDYT ?
>
>     Antoine
>
>     [1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290
>     _______________________________________________
>     cdi-dev mailing list
>     cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>     Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
>     the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>

-- 
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic