[cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting

Tue Jun 21 11:16:23 EDT 2016

Monday is better for me but I can do both.
On Jun 21, 2016 11:14, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
wrote:

> So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
> meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
> I can do both but prefer Monday.
>
> What is your choice?
>
> Antoine
>
> Le mar. 21 juin 2016 à 16:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> I just went through the PR one more time.  It seems like these are the
>> areas of open discussion still:
>>
>> - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided.  I'm in
>> agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help IMHO.
>> - Disassociating the thread model and the context model.  This is the
>> first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there are
>> any concerns with that change.
>> - The fact that contexts have IDs.  To me it makes sense, but it seems
>> like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to make
>> sure we can bridge from existing)
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
>>>
>>> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
>>> presence is not required.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
>>> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
>>> now
>>> > is the only day I have open.
>>> >
>>> > What about next week? Monday?
>>> >
>>> > John
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
>>> >
>>> >     I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
>>> >
>>> >     What I particularly dislike:
>>> >     * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
>>> >     * the concept of the context id
>>> >     * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
>>> method/class
>>> >     for each supported scope)
>>> >
>>> >     Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll find
>>> out
>>> >     that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
>>> believe we
>>> >     will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
>>> complex
>>> >     API (without sacrificing correctness).
>>> >
>>> >     Martin
>>> >
>>> >     [1]
>>> >
>>> http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
>>> >      > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
>>> >      > I’ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
>>> >      >
>>> >      > LieGrue,
>>> >      > strub
>>> >      >
>>> >      >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
>>> >     <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>>:
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> Hi all,
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
>>> >     proposal regarding CDI-30:
>>> >      >> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I am
>>> >     this week.
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> Antoine
>>> >      >> _______________________________________________
>>> >      >> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> >      >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >      >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>> >      >
>>> >      >
>>> >      > _______________________________________________
>>> >      > cdi-dev mailing list
>>> >      > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >      > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >      >
>>> >      > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>> >      >
>>> >
>>> >     --
>>> >     Martin Kouba
>>> >     Software Engineer
>>> >     Red Hat, Czech Republic
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     cdi-dev mailing list
>>> >     cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >
>>> >     Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
>>> >     the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Kouba
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/3e4c083b/attachment-0001.html 