[cdi-dev] Last review on PR 290 (SE bootstrap)

[John D. Ament]

Yes.
On Jun 29, 2016 7:47 AM, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
wrote:

> You mean the instance of SeContainerInitializer obtained thru
> getInstance() ?
> Le mer. 29 juin 2016 à 13:26, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Antoine,
>>
>> Looks like we may have missed one of the earlier comments, about reusing
>> the instance vs creating a new one each time.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:23 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand <
>> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I just push changed decided in yesterday meeting to PR 290[1]. Please
>>> review them and give a +1 on it if you're ok for the merge.
>>> Generated version of the spec is available here [2].
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>> [1]: https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290
>>> [2]:
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html#bootstrap-se
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>
>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
>>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160629/ce163e91/attachment.html