[cdi-dev] Last review on PR 290 (SE bootstrap)

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

Correct me if i'm wrong John. Are you suggesting
that SeContainerInitializer#getInstance() should return always the same
initializer?  I don't remember this comment.
What would be the advantage of that instead of getting a new one at each
call ?
If we want to have the SeContainerInitializer reusable we should probably
add a kind of 'reset()' method.

Wdyt

Antoine

Le mer. 29 juin 2016 à 15:07, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Yes.
> On Jun 29, 2016 7:47 AM, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> wrote:
>
>> You mean the instance of SeContainerInitializer obtained thru
>> getInstance() ?
>> Le mer. 29 juin 2016 à 13:26, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Antoine,
>>>
>>> Looks like we may have missed one of the earlier comments, about reusing
>>> the instance vs creating a new one each time.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:23 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand <
>>> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I just push changed decided in yesterday meeting to PR 290[1]. Please
>>>> review them and give a +1 on it if you're ok for the merge.
>>>> Generated version of the spec is available here [2].
>>>>
>>>> Antoine
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290
>>>> [2]:
>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html#bootstrap-se
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>>
>>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
>>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
>>>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160629/b8a48e2c/attachment.html