[cdi-dev] Merging JSR-330 into CDI

[Reza Rahman]

They could certainly support the smallest CDI module/profile. The way the proposal looks, it should be pretty tiny and almost just the same as JSR 330.

> On Mar 19, 2016, at 11:57 AM, aalmiray <aalmiray at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> How would this move affect existing implementations, such as Guice,
> Springframework, Dagger, Afterburner, Griffon, etc? These implementations
> rely on a tiny core (the small JSR-330 JAR file) and nothing more. 
> 
> What are the foreseeable consequences of such move (as a subspec)?
> 
> Cheers,
> Andres
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://cdi-development-mailing-list.1064426.n5.nabble.com/Merging-JSR-330-into-CDI-tp5712810p5712812.html
> Sent from the CDI Development mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> 
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.