[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-590) Provide a way to produce any type in a producer

Martin Kouba (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Tue Mar 22 10:50:00 EDT 2016


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13180679#comment-13180679 ] 

Martin Kouba commented on CDI-590:
----------------------------------

bq.  it doesn't support a lot of types
I thought a custom producer for any type [can be implemented|https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/deltaspike/core/api/src/main/java/org/apache/deltaspike/core/api/config/ConfigProperty.java#L78].
bq. Just use PropertyEditor API...
I don't know what do you mean. Probably {{java.beans.PropertyEditor}}?
bq. Tamaya has its own coercing system which wouldnt fit CDI very well...
For Tamaya I think it would be more meaningful to create a producer for {{org.apache.tamaya.Configuration}}. But I understand that it would be nice to leverage {{PropertyConverter}}  and produce configuration properties directly.

Look, I'm not against this feature! I'm just trying to identify all pros and cons ;-)


> Provide a way to produce any type in a producer
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-590
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-590
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Epic
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> Note: this is a follow up "adding generic producers to CDI 2.0?" thread on the list
> It is common to rely on a subsystem (another IoC, a coercing system, ...) to produce values. Today a producer can't say "I produce anything in a safe" manner.
> Idea would be for injection point aware producers with a qualifier to producer Object and match all types.
> It needs another flag (can be in @Qualifier or another annotation it is not really important) to say "I produce safely any type".
> I did a PoC on github: https://github.com/rmannibucau/generic-producer-cdi but think it can be a nice feature of CDI 2.0 since it would avoid users to have to dig into extensions for several simple cases (configuration, bridge to other IoC...)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list