[cdi-dev] Spliting SE package in an independent jar

Emily Jiang EMIJIANG at uk.ibm.com
Tue Oct 18 05:09:29 EDT 2016


+1 on John's proposal. +1 on splitting.


Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
 
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal: 246278

Email: emijiang at uk.ibm.com 
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM at IBMGB




From:   Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com>
To:     John Ament <john.ament at spartasystems.com>, Antoine Sabot-Durand 
<antoine at sabot-durand.net>, cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Date:   13/10/2016 08:57
Subject:        Re: [cdi-dev] Spliting SE package in an independent jar
Sent by:        cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org



+1 for John's proposal.

So there will be two API artifacts:
* cdi-api
* cdi-se-api (depends on cdi-api)

Martin

Dne 12.10.2016 v 12:40 John Ament napsal(a):
> the way I've envisioned it:
>
>
> - There is no dedicated EE API (none that I could find that is EE only,
> except for perhaps session scoped)t
>
> - There is SE specific API and the current API could be considered 
"core"
>
>
>
> Take the current API module and create two submodules, one for core and
> one for SE.  SE depends on core.  EE still refers to core as the same
> existing coordinates (create new coordinates for the parent).
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
> <cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org> on behalf of Antoine Sabot-Durand
> <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:18 AM
> *To:* cdi-dev
> *Subject:* [cdi-dev] Spliting SE package in an independent jar
>
> to avoid including CDI SE features in Java EE, we already talk about
> creating a specific SE jar.
>
> Any thought on this approach?
>
> Antoine
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain
> confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be
> treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and
> destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the 
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas 
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other 
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>

-- 
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the 
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas 
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other 
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.



Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20161018/0246016c/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list