From struberg at yahoo.de Mon Dec 25 13:24:05 2017 From: struberg at yahoo.de (Mark Struberg) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 19:24:05 +0100 Subject: [cdi-dev] Duplicate javax.annotation packages and Java 9 In-Reply-To: <1553078730.2596152.1508771456447@mail.yahoo.com> References:

<9b29745e-9c00-5867-c5bc-5d1cb862cae4@redhat.com> <1553078730.2596152.1508771456447@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Pulling this up again. It seems that the JDK team finally realised that they trashed tons of working projects with Jigsaw. Of course, that's kind of natural with such a big change - but they have to clean it up now. They are currently looking into removing all sorts of libraries from the JDK. E.g. the whole JAX-WS and JAX-B parts. Antoine, do you want to also contact them in regards of common-annotations? Has anyone more information what is on the plate about what else is about to be removed from the JDK? txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 23.10.2017 um 17:10 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > >> Now that JDK9 is out, if we want EE4J 9 (or whatever it's version will > >> be) to support jigsaw, we'll probably have to change packages names :-(. > > > > What packages do you have in mind? We don't "own" javax.annotation and > > we cannot introduce our own priority annotation... > > Indeed we (CDI) do not own common-annotations. > That was the reason why the JSR-250 working group release a MR for it which did contain the changes we needed in CDI. So from our side (EE) all was fine imo. > It's just that the SE team didn't update the JDK to this official MR it seems. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > On Monday, 23 October 2017, 10:31:22 GMT+2, Martin Kouba wrote: > > Dne 23.10.2017 v 10:17 Antoine Sabot-Durand napsal(a): > > I encountered the same type of collision with > > java.transaction.InvalidTransactionException which is in the JDK and in > > JTA. I remember sending this problem to jigsaw ML [1], but obviously > > they didn't have time to do something or expect having Java EE spec do > > the required stuff :-(. > > Now that JDK9 is out, if we want EE4J 9 (or whatever it's version will > > be) to support jigsaw, we'll probably have to change packages names :-(. > > What packages do you have in mind? We don't "own" javax.annotation and > we cannot introduce our own priority annotation... > > > > > > > Antoine > > > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008779.html > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:51 AM Martin Kouba > > wrote: > > > > For the record, the CDI API itself does not define a dependency on > > javax.annotation at all. > > > > In fact, I'm wondering why @Priority is not part of JDK?? I suppose the > > reasons are similar to why javax.annotation.Priority only has > > @Target({TYPE,PARAMETER}) (even if we tried to push other element > > types :-(. > > > > M > > > > Dne 21.10.2017 v 16:22 John Ament napsal(a): > > > Hey all > > > > > > > > > Not sure where else to turn ? > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to start testing my apps on Java 9, I believe Java 9 kicks > > > back the javax.annotation dependency that CDI declares due to a > > package > > > collision with the built in JDK's javax.annotation package > > > > > . > > > The errors I get are due to missing javax/annotation/Priority. I'm > > > wondering if anyone else has tried this, and if there's a clean > > work around? > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain > > > confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which > > should be > > > treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please > > > notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this > > message, and > > > destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > cdi-dev mailing list > > > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > > > > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider > > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 > > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other > > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and > > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > > > > > > > -- > > Martin Kouba > > Senior Software Engineer > > Red Hat, Czech Republic > > _______________________________________________ > > cdi-dev mailing list > > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses > > the code under the Apache License, Version 2 > > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other > > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and > > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > > > > -- > Martin Kouba > Senior Software Engineer > Red Hat, Czech Republic > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.