[cdi-dev] ProcessAnnotatedType & Bean Discovery mode

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

Yes it’s the correct interpretation.
Confusion may come from the fact that we first considered to specify this feature the other way around (discover all types on implicites bean archive but only keep classes with BDA for bean discovery). We switched to this approach because we thought it was better for backward compatibility.

Antoine 

> Le 24 juil. 2017 à 08:27, Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> I think OWB interpretation is correct.
> 
> In an implicit bean archive (implicit = bean archive with 
> bean-discovery-mode=annotated) PAT is only fired for discovered types 
> and the container only discovers each class with a bean defining annotation.
> 
> For trimmed bean archive - only explicit bean archives may be marked as 
> 'trimmed'. PAT is fired there but if it does not have a bean defining 
> annotation it's removed from the set of discovered types, i.e. no bean 
> is created.
> 
> Martin
> 
> Dne 23.7.2017 v 14:32 John Ament napsal(a):
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> An issue popped up in OWB wanted to get the EG's perspective on this.
>> 
>> 
>> I have a given bean archive, with a class in it (no bean defining 
>> annotations).  My interpretation of [1] and [2] is that this class is 
>> fired as a ProcessAnnotatedType, regardless of what is in beans.xml.  In 
>> OWB, if I do bean-discovery-mode=annotated it does not get fired, but if 
>> it is all, even with a <trim/> a PAT gets fired.  However it seems that 
>> it should get fired before anything is even considered about the class, 
>> and whether it has annotations.
>> 
>> 
>> [1]: 
>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#process_annotated_type
>> 
>> [2]: 
>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-spec.html#process_annotated_type
>> 
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain 
>> confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be 
>> treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
>> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and 
>> destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> 
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Martin Kouba
> Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> 
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.