[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-740) Proxy fields can be accessed if they are protected or package private

Matej Novotny (Jira) issues at jboss.org
Mon Dec 3 04:45:04 EST 2018


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13669155#comment-13669155 ] 

Matej Novotny commented on CDI-740:
-----------------------------------

bq. Is this intentional, are there any valid uses cases for them, or is it just an oversight?

Does it even make sense to ask this? Accessing fields directly is undesirable as a (java) practice in the first place...
Anyway, I have no idea if it was intentional back when it was specified this way but adjusting it now will cause backward compat. problems as now working applications would suddenly crash during bootstrap.

> Proxy fields can be accessed if they are protected or package private
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-740
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-740
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Beans, Contexts, Java EE integration
>         Environment: IBM WebSphere Liberty, Java EE 7.0 Full Platform
>            Reporter: Frigo Coder
>            Priority: Major
>
> CDI detects and rejects proxyable beans if they expose a public field. However protected and package private fields are silently accepted. In the following example the method returns 0 instead of the correct value of 8:
> {code:java}
> @ApplicationScoped
> public class Car {
>     @Inject
>     private Engine engine;
>     public int numberOfEngineCylinders() {
>         return engine.cylinders;
>     }
> }
> @RequestScoped
> public class Engine {
>     protected int cylinders;
>     @PostConstruct
>     public void init() {
>         cylinders = 8;
>     }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list