<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">
<div>Hey Romain,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">Von: </span><<a href="mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org">cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org</a>> on behalf of Romain Manni-Bucau <<a href="mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com">rmannibucau@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Datum: </span>Saturday 13 February 2016 23:30<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">An: </span>"John D. Ament" <<a href="mailto:john.d.ament@gmail.com">john.d.ament@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>CDI-Dev <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Betreff: </span>Re: [cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-527 / PR 271 allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;">
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none;">The
gotcha that I still see is around interceptor bindings. They need to be explicitly disallowed on final methods, and big ole warning put in when you have interceptors on classes with final methods.</span></blockquote>
</span>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In my experience legacy (framework) code tends to have protected final methods, so the problems might be less dangerous than they appear first place (regarding interceptors). </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I would just warn that a non-proxyable class is proxied, and certain problems arise by doing so. You can name the problems, sure. But I think it is ok to say (in bold): Yes, we do what you want. But live with the consequences.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jens</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>