[forge-dev] forge stuff

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 18:39:21 EDT 2011


(Copying forge-dev)

Agreed. I've put this on the roadmap for Alpha4. We have a lot of work to do
in this regard.

~Lincoln

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker.nl at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Lincoln,
>
> I started using the source-plugin mechanism and that works great!
>
> About public APIs, that's really difficult. I'm afraid many plugins need
> other core plugins on the classpath, even if it's only to check if a certain
> facet is installed because @RequiresFacet needs a Class as an argument.
> What would be needed is an *-API module for some of the important core
> plugins I think such as project-model, and the J2EE plugins. What exactly
> should and shouldn't be in the API is hard to say. Maybe it's an idea to
> create a list of dependencies that are needed in the non-core plugins
> created so far. That would at least give a first impression on what should
> be in the API. It's difficult to figure this out before people actually
> start to use it, but it's too late to figure this out after a lot of plugins
> are created because all of them will brake after refactoring.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Paul,
>>
>> (Copying forge-dev)
>>
>> You're right, this should probably be clarified in the docs. It's safe to
>> assume that the* forge-shell-api *is what will be made available, as the
>> plugin guide states (only indirectly because it's the only depenency in the
>> POM). I'm not really sure how best to handle other requirements yet at this
>> point, like if you needed to reference the MavenCoreFacet directly, for
>> instance, how to handle exposing other "core plugins" that aren't really
>> part of the core API yet.
>>
>> Loving your ideas for plugins. Keep em coming! I'm going to be working
>> with management at JBoss to get the central plugin index up and running so
>> we can make it even easier to share, though, It will probably take a while.
>>
>> Your thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated :)
>> ~Lincoln
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker.nl at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lincoln,
>>>
>>> The dependencies that you found in the Arquillian plugin where actually
>>> obsolete. I needed them for the first approach I tried (loading project
>>> classes) which I abandoned later. I removed them and all is still working.
>>>
>>> I noticed something that might be confusing in the docs. There's a
>>> warning not to include libs that are provided by Forge. How does someone
>>> know which libraries to include and which not? Maybe we should  provide a
>>> list of provided libraries in the docs? Another thing that's not completely
>>> clear now is what Forge classes/interfaces are safe to use in a plugin. Are
>>> all classes in *-api modules usable, and all others not? And how does
>>> someone know about those api modules without looking at the source code?
>>> This should be specified clearly in the docs. If people start writing
>>> plugins using implementation classes they might brake easily with new
>>> versions of Forge.
>>>
>>> I have a few new ideas for plugins too:
>>> -Code quality plugin -> configure checkstyle/findbugs/sonar in Maven with
>>> single commands
>>> -JSF components plugin -> configure Richfaces / Primefaces with a single
>>> command
>>> -Hibernate 2nd level cache -> configure 2nd level caching using one of
>>> the many implementations
>>>
>>> All of them just do configuration on the project. To my experience those
>>> types of configuration normally involve a lot of copy/paste from manuals
>>> while setting them up. Forge can do that for us :-)
>>> What do you think about them? I have some time again this weekend, so
>>> I'll get started on one of them.
>>>
>>> Let me say again that it's incredibly fun to work and discuss on this!
>>> Wish I have more time :-)
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.com
>> http://scrumshark.com
>> "Keep it Simple"
>>
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20110405/2ed6cb33/attachment.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list