[forge-dev] shading!?

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

Can you give an example of how you would bundle the JARs? (Just put them in
/META-INF/dependencies/ ... ?) And would that not cause just as many class
conflicts? If you shade/relocate then the deps *should be* completely
isolated.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <
max.andersen at redhat.com> wrote:

> well, recommending just bundling jars would be a better approach than
> shading IMO.
>
> /max
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 16:00, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>
> > Yeah, shading is currently the recommended approach. Conflicts should be
> avoided by using relocations. I know this is... not a great method, but for
> now it's all we've got. Open to suggestions.
> >
> > ~Lincoln
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <
> max.andersen at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > Lincoln, I just saw your commits to hibernattools plugin at (
> https://github.com/forge/plugin-hibernate-tools/commit/8b208b4a8e79dbb8a01d10d266ee81afd2cf7106
> )
> >
> > Is shading of jars really the recommended approach for plugins in Forge ?
> >
> > How are you going to share/avoid collisions of libraries across plugins
> if they need to bundle via shading ?
> >
> > /max
> > http://about.me/maxandersen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lincoln Baxter, III
> > http://ocpsoft.com
> > http://scrumshark.com
> > "Keep it Simple"
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20110411/f32409f9/attachment.html