[forge-dev] I18N Plugin

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

Word :)

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:49 AM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com>wrote:

> There you go ! https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-542 :)
>
> 2012/4/17 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>:
> > This sounds like something that would go well in the "dev-plugins"
> module.
> > Good idea! I've also been wanting a plugin to create a new ServiceLoader
> > service registration in META-INF/services, based on an interface and
> class
> > implementation.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:55 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> Just created a new issue (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-541)
> >> regarding i18n support on Forge enabled projects.
> >>
> >> I was thinking if it should it be part of Forge core. WDYT ?
> >>
> >>
> >> Feel free to add any new comment on this issue. I plan to start
> >> working on it still this week.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> George Gastaldi
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> forge-dev mailing list
> >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lincoln Baxter, III
> > http://ocpsoft.org
> > "Simpler is better."
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120417/f22e2ff8/attachment.html