[forge-dev] Forge website domain (DISCUSS)

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Mon Apr 30 04:54:28 EDT 2012


Ok. I am currently discussing with Mark, so I need to finish that first.

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <
max.andersen at redhat.com> wrote:

> so Lincoln, you need to request that from help at jboss.org or TAG since its
> a different layout than anything else.
>
> I'll support it but lets get the process started then.
>
> /max
>
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 20:30 , Paul Bakker wrote:
>
> > On the topic of the domain name, I think forge.jboss.org is the very
> best for several reasons:
> > 1) It's matches the name (JBoss Forge) we communicate well
> > 2) It's still clear that it's a JBoss project
> > 3) We could potentially migrate it to any other hosting solution if
> required for technical reasons
> > 4) It communicates better then jboss.org/forge
> >
> > I don't think we should adopt any extra domain names, this is just
> confusing.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Apr 26, 2012, at 16:53 , Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> >
> >> The plugin repository is a place where authors can, online, without
> interacting with Git directly, add their plugin, a description, how to
> install/get started, and basic usage of the plugin. It's a webapp that runs
> on top of the repo git repository. It's searchable, and much like this:
> http://grails.org/plugins/
> >>
> >> ~Lincoln
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> ----- "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > >> * jboss.org/forge -> this can be easily got. However we cannot
> >> > have
> >> > >> all the services that we need (like hosting our plugin repository
> >> > for
> >> > >> example). We should stick to the ones offered by the jboss.org
> >> > server
> >> > >
> >> > > -1 if we have limitations
> >> >
> >> > What does hosting plugin repo require ?
> >> >
> >> > I thought the repo was just a static file that would be regenerated
> >> > from time to time ?
> >>
> >> >From conversations with Lincoln, the repository would be more dynamic
> (e.g. web app) than static.  I'll let Lincoln list the details.  The other
> item we discussed was the URL's themselves as
> >>
> >> forge.jboss.org/plugins would be preferred over
> >> jboss.org/forge/plugins
> >>
> >> but that specifically is an aesthetic issue more than a technical one
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Would a reverse proxy setup be sufficient ?
> >> >
> >> > i.e. jboss.org/forge/repo redirected to some openshift hosted setup ?
> >> >
> >> > I don't think jboss.org guys would reject that upfront if they get
> >> > asked.
> >> >
> >> > Depends of course of what IT etc. says and how the setup works - i.e.
> >> > I got such setup for jboss central feeds to feedburner and the only
> >> > challenge
> >> > been that they only allow proxy redirect to specific set of IP's but
> >> > that shouldn't
> >> > be a a big problem for this should it ?
> >> >
> >> > >> * forge.jboss.org -> we can use this domain name in all kinds of
> >> > cloud
> >> > >> solutions (like Openshift). There we will be in power to choose
> >> > the
> >> > >> web site technology
> >> > >
> >> > > +1
> >> >
> >> > I got tools.jboss.org setup, but that just goes to jboss.org/toolsand
> >> > just because
> >> > this was asked for long before they started using: issues.jboss.org,
> >> > community.jboss.org, source.jboss.org etc.
> >> >
> >> > forge.jboss.org falls a bit outside of this so not sure how that
> fits,
> >> > but worth asking jboss.org guys about.
> >> >
> >> > /max
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > forge-dev mailing list
> >> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> forge-dev mailing list
> >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Lincoln Baxter, III
> >> http://ocpsoft.org
> >> "Simpler is better."
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> forge-dev mailing list
> >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120430/247e4b7a/attachment.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list