[forge-dev] Opinion poll: Jackson vs Errai

[Luca Masini]

Pete I think that Thomas is talking about the marshalling protocol used by
Errai, you can use its own or one that is "jackson compatible".

I prefere the latter because I use JAX-RS services that produces JSON with
Jackson.

Ciao.


2012/12/19 Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>

> Jackson is a marshalling library for XML and JSON. Errai is a framework
> for building apps that execute in the browser. I'm not sure you can replace
> one with the other.
>
> On 19 Dec 2012, at 13:55, A-ON Puls Referenz-User wrote:
>
> > Sorry I was not up to the point, I am talking of current implementation
> of Aerogear scaffold of Forge.
> >
> > The question is: should Aerogear scaffold continue with Jackson or
> migrate to Errai?
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
> > Von: "Luca Masini"
> > Erhalten: 19.12.2012 13:03
> > An: "forge-dev List"
> >
> > Hi Thomas, I didn't understand very well the question in your poll.
> >
> > Anyway when you talk about the marshalling, do you mean an annotation
> that know how to manage how to serialize persistent collection ??
> >
> > In a way, are you talking about the problem that frameworks like Gilead
> try to solve ??
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/18 Thomas Frühbeck < fruehbeck at aon.at >
> > Hi,
> >
> > during experiments extending a generated aerogear application I found
> that
> >   - the current integration of JSON via Jackson is kinda creative hack
> >   - not easily portable to recent releases of Jackson (see above)
> >   - does not make use of annotation driven UI/ser/deserializ. processing
> >
> > During my investigations on upgrade possibilities to modern Jackson I
> realized, that Errai is a very powerful and complete framework well worth
> being featured
> > in Forge's scaffold.
> > As I am not really deep into Jackson/JSON/Rest yet I would like to ask
> for your opinion on this.
> >
> > Another question regarding use of annotations in a scaffold:
> > Especially regarding modern Errai/Jackson annotations are an easy means
> to control the UI / (De-)Serialization, e.g. when working with entities, I
> think it is
> > necessary to use persistence-based entity instantiation before
> deserialization, to avoid loss of data if an incomplete entity is
> desrialized and persisted by
> > merge().
> >
> > Do you think it acceptable to actively insert annotations into entity
> code - possibly by a scaffold command like "scaffold applyAnnotations"?
> >
> > In my opinion this could provide interesting best practice propagation
> for novices like me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ****************************************
> > http://www.lucamasini.net
> > http://twitter.com/lmasini
> > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9
> > ****************************************
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
****************************************
http://www.lucamasini.net
http://twitter.com/lmasini
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9
****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20121219/73c50dd4/attachment.html