[forge-dev] How should plugins keep up with api updates

[Burr Sutter]

Right, i think that is what Thomas was suggesting - that Forge will need a much more mature plug-in manager that address versioning, dependencies, marketing, etc. soon.

On May 31, 2012, at 3:56 AM, Koen Aers wrote:

> Hi Lincoln,
> 
> Plugin dependencies could become a reality very soon. Imagine a plugin that adds a facet to a project that is being used by yet another plugin…
> 
> Cheers,
> Koen
> 
> Op 31-mei-2012, om 08:30 heeft Lincoln Baxter, III het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> Ah, you were talking about eclipse. Yes, this makes sense. It's painful. I was confused because Forge currently doesn't have any plugin dependencies.
>> 
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Thomas Frühbeck <fruehbeck at aon.at> wrote:
>> Lincoln,
>> are you one of those lucky guys who don't have to hassle regularly with incompatible plugins in Eclipse? 
>> Just a hint: 
>>     - I tried to install JBoss Tools 32bit into classic Eclipse 32bit on Win7 - it failed in the middle of installing ???
>>     - SVN: there are two prominent plugins, incompatible, one looking half way like the other but handling is very different in the hard cases, PITA from start to end, I see myself reverting regularly to the command line 
>>     - for some time recently I couldn't update my m2e plugin because it carried a dependency to a something in version 1.1 which was not released yet ???
>> 
>> Have a look at the different flavors Eclipse IDE bundles - to me the main reason for those is: plug-in (inter-) dependencies and plug-in management.
>> I don't want to complain, but to me these are the everyday problems I face _after_ I told my boss that the fix xxx will only take an hour :-/ (The fix itself may take 5 minutes, the rest of the day it will take to get the infrastructure of the project up and running again.)
>> 
>> And then we are programmers open for the newest, latest, greatest. And of course any author of a plugin would want his customers to pick up the new functionality ASAP. 
>> So I think one core features is a stable, manageable plugin life cycle.
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> Am 31.05.2012 07:40, schrieb Lincoln Baxter, III:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Well said Thomas - I am a great "dumb user" and plug-in dependencies drive me nuts.
>>> 
>>> What do you mean by plug-in dependencies? What drives you nuts?
>>>  
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org
>> "Simpler is better."
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120531/a04416a5/attachment.html