[forge-dev] Forge performance considerations / Bootstrap / modularity

Thomas Frühbeck fruehbeck at aon.at
Tue Nov 6 01:38:33 EST 2012

Thanks for your support, please have a look at the change for https://github.com/shadogray/core/commit/0365b50e46e6ceb9863de2aab27dae1387db51bf
I cannot find anything wrong about it, it's not elegant - just time saving :-)


Am 05.11.2012 19:20, schrieb ggastald at redhat.com:
> In this case, I want to apologize for my previously incorrect statement.
> Thomas, we can work together to have this all set up in 1.1.2.Final which is due next week, what do you think ?
> Best Regards,
> George Gastaldi
> On 11/05/2012 02:42 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>> Yes, just for clarification, we are still making major updates and improvements to 1.x in parallel to 2.0 research.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20121106/19188939/attachment.html 

More information about the forge-dev mailing list