[forge-dev] Forge performance considerations / Bootstrap / modularity

[Ivan St. Ivanov]

Guys, remember what was the promise? Whoever makes Forge start faster, gets
a Forge T-shirt.... :-)

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:42 PM, <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:

>  Tested and merged. It decreased the startup time for about 2 seconds in
> my tests.
>
> Thanks !
>
>
> On 11/06/2012 04:38 AM, Thomas Frühbeck wrote:
>
> Thanks for your support, please have a look at the change for
> https://github.com/shadogray/core/commit/0365b50e46e6ceb9863de2aab27dae1387db51bf
> I cannot find anything wrong about it, it's not elegant - just time saving
> :-)
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> Am 05.11.2012 19:20, schrieb ggastald at redhat.com:
>
> In this case, I want to apologize for my previously incorrect statement.
>
> Thomas, we can work together to have this all set up in 1.1.2.Final which
> is due next week, what do you think ?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> On 11/05/2012 02:42 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>
> Yes, just for clarification, we are still making major updates and
> improvements to 1.x in parallel to 2.0 research.
>
>
>
> --
> *George Gastaldi* | *Senior Software Engineer*
> JBoss Forge Team
> Red Hat
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20121106/d0bf4e6c/attachment.html