[forge-dev] plugin-errai: first working version

[Thomas Frühbeck]

Well, honestly, it's a still bit of a hack I came up with to achieve 
_my_ goals using means available to me, so perhaps it will not stand 
experts scrutiny.
But I am really looking forward to discuss it to find a clean and well 
integrated solution.

Thomas

Am 11.02.2013 21:59, schrieb Lincoln Baxter, III:
> Thomas, this is FANTASTIC!
>
> Have the Errai guys seen this yet??
>
> We just finished discussing getting collaborative/shared scaffold 
> architecture for Forge2, so this could definitely have a big part to play!
>
> ~Lincoln
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Frühbeck <fruehbeck at aon.at 
> <mailto:fruehbeck at aon.at>> wrote:
>
>     Hi George,
>
>     thank you for your kind words. What _you_ guys do simply rocks,
>     can't help wondering how :-))
>
>     And yes, a merge of those two plugins would be an absolute fit,
>     great idea! I will do my best to get my plugin fit for it.
>
>     Best regards,
>     Thomas
>
>     Am 11.02.2013 05:51, schrieb George Gastaldi:
>>     Hi Thomas !
>>
>>     This is awesome ! Good job. By the way, have you seen Pavel's
>>     work on the errai plugin in https://github.com/errai/forge-errai ?
>>     It would be great if these two could be merged together.
>>
>>     Thoughts anyone ?
>>
>>     George Gastaldi
>>
>>     Em 10/02/2013, às 23:03, Thomas Frühbeck <fruehbeck at aon.at
>>     <mailto:fruehbeck at aon.at>> escreveu:
>>
>>>     Hi,
>>>
>>>     I just finished a first somwhat working version of my errai
>>>     plugin. It's not cleaned up yet, and some aspects are not yet
>>>     implemented, but basic functionality is there. You can find it
>>>     under https://github.com/shadogray/plugin-errai
>>>
>>>     For the interested reader a sample scenario may be seen at:
>>>     https://github.com/shadogray/plugin-errai/tree/master/src/test/java/org/jboss/forge/scaffold/errai/metawidget/widgetprocessor
>>>
>>>     @Lincoln: I would be happy if you/someone could spare some time
>>>     to have a look at it, so perhaps I may get an official place in
>>>     the hall-of-fame at https://github.com/forge :-)
>>>
>>>     The design is awkward, but that's, what the abovementioned test
>>>     should produce:
>>>
>>>     <ffcjbfjc.png>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     forge-dev mailing list
>>>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     forge-dev mailing list
>>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     forge-dev mailing list
>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20130212/d024146e/attachment.html