[forge-dev] Checking in on Gradle Addon

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

The reason the dependency resolution fails is because the Gradle addon is
omitting the dependency type from the coordinates, here. It is trying to
resolve a JAR but only a POM exists.


   private GradleDependencyBuilder forgeDepToGradleDepBuilder(Dependency
forgeDep)

   {

      return GradleDependencyBuilder.create()

               .setConfiguration(GradleDependencyConfiguration

                        .fromMavenScope(forgeDep.getScopeType()).getName())

               .setGroup(forgeDep.getCoordinate().getGroupId())

               .setName(forgeDep.getCoordinate().getArtifactId())

               .setVersion(forgeDep.getCoordinate().getVersion());

   }


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Adam,
>
> Seems like things have been a bit quiet, but I've been reviewing the Forge
> Gradle Addon, and it's looking good! I've reproduced the dependency
> resolution issue you ran in to, but I'm not exactly sure where the error
> lies. Looking in to it.
>
> You asked what to work on next. And I think that if you have finished all
> of the core/required functionality, it might be interesting to add a Forge
> UICommand/UIWizard to set up this eclipse config:
>
> http://www.gradle.org/docs/current/userguide/eclipse_plugin.html
>
> That should make it easier for people to import Gradle projects into
> eclipse. Do you think this has value?
>
> Alternatively, have you tested the scenario where a user attempts to use
> an existing Gradle project with Forge? It does not appear that this is
> tested yet, so that might be useful to explore. I believe this may raise a
> few new issues like, "Should we modify the user's gradle.build script in
> order to support Forge operations?" and "How should we ask them?"
>
> It's possible that you could simply create a temporary build descriptor
> with the required forge library, execute that, then delete it. Or perhaps a
> new command in Forge to "Make a gradle project editable by forge."
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20130904/76526f56/attachment.html