[forge-dev] Obtaining project name in persistence provider

Ivan St. Ivanov ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com
Sat Jan 25 15:58:11 EST 2014


Thanks, George!

As I am not really keen to change the interface definition, I would do it
as you proposed: without the project name.

Cheers,
Ivan


On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>wrote:

> Hey Ivan,
> You could change the configure method signature to pass the project as a
> parameter, but remember that it may be null.
>
> However, I think it would be better to not add the projectName to the DDL
> file in order to keep it simple and easier to find.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> Em 25/01/2014, às 18:42, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1443. It's not a
> big deal, it's a matter of adding a few lines to the JavaEEDefaultProvider
> class.
>
> One of the requirements is that the create and drop scripts should bear
> the name of the project: <projectName>Creade.ddl and <projectName>Drop.ddl.
> I wonder is there a way to pass that somehow to the persistence provider?
>
> Thanks,
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20140125/f421d0ef/attachment.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list