From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Thu Oct  2 21:15:00 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:15:00 -0700
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>

I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!

Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !

~Lincoln

-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141002/433d3b1f/attachment.html 

From danielsoro at gmail.com  Fri Oct  3 11:02:55 2014
From: danielsoro at gmail.com (Daniel Cunha)
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:02:55 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>

The new website is awesome! :)

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
> 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
>
> Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
>
> ~Lincoln
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141003/57d7f816/attachment.html 

From rruss at redhat.com  Fri Oct  3 14:17:07 2014
From: rruss at redhat.com (Rodney Russ)
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Daniel Cunha" <danielsoro at gmail.com>
> To: "forge-dev List" <forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 9:02:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!

> The new website is awesome! :)
+1 

> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com > wrote:

> > I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
> > 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
> 

> > Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
> 

> > ~Lincoln
> 

> > --
> 
> > Lincoln Baxter, III
> 
> > http://ocpsoft.org
> 
> > "Simpler is better."
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> 
> > forge-dev mailing list
> 
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> 
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> 

> --

> Daniel Cunha (soro) < http://www.cejug.net >

> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha

> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141003/7093248f/attachment.html 

From rmpestano at gmail.com  Sun Oct 12 10:38:03 2014
From: rmpestano at gmail.com (Rafael Pestano)
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 11:38:03 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>
Message-ID: <CADjFuPo6LN7DNokcHhnpogDJw_u1M2RMiN=JKmBt+24w4rKAag@mail.gmail.com>

Hey guys, congratulations for the release but i'm having problems running
forge 2.1.12 in eclipse Luna, it just hangs when i start forge, see video
below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3n1D7qYjM

thanks in advance

2014-10-03 15:17 GMT-03:00 Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com>:

>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Daniel Cunha" <danielsoro at gmail.com>
> *To: *"forge-dev List" <forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> *Sent: *Friday, October 3, 2014 9:02:55 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
>
> The new website is awesome! :)
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
>> 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
>>
>> Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
>>
>> ~Lincoln
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org
>> "Simpler is better."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
<http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,

Rafael M. Pestano

Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
@realpestano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141012/4a4812cd/attachment.html 

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Sun Oct 12 15:32:23 2014
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 22:32:23 +0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Security addon in Forge
Message-ID: <CACYLA9Fmrd0D8XhSz-H2iuf0bz9Y_GzqjeuL=X0pUnimC_r0gw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi folks,

I wanted to add a new addon to Forge that handles the Java EE security
topics:

- Add constraints to some resources
- Setup authentication mechanism (form, basic, digest, etc.)
- Assign realm to security constraints
- Create security roles
- If the realm is JDBC and JPA facet is installed, add an entity along with
some named queries

I looked in the Forge JIRA whether there is something like that and I found
this issue created almost a year and a half ago:

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152

I read in the description though, that the addon should be also able to
setup groups and users inside a realm. Isn't that too server specific if
the realm is not JDBC? Maybe we could continue the communication in the
issue, so whoever is interested my add themselves as a watcher there?

Cheers,
Ivan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141012/fb6e2395/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Sun Oct 12 17:05:55 2014
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:05:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [forge-dev] Security addon in Forge
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9Fmrd0D8XhSz-H2iuf0bz9Y_GzqjeuL=X0pUnimC_r0gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACYLA9Fmrd0D8XhSz-H2iuf0bz9Y_GzqjeuL=X0pUnimC_r0gw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <EB659B37-841A-4D04-ADF0-C518B4C8D63E@redhat.com>

Have you checked the Picketlink addon? 

http://forge.jboss.org/addon/org.picketlink.tools.forge:picketlink-forge-addon

Check it out, because I believe it already does some stuff that you are looking for.

> Em 12/10/2014, ?s 22:32, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I wanted to add a new addon to Forge that handles the Java EE security topics:
> 
> - Add constraints to some resources
> - Setup authentication mechanism (form, basic, digest, etc.)
> - Assign realm to security constraints
> - Create security roles
> - If the realm is JDBC and JPA facet is installed, add an entity along with some named queries
> 
> I looked in the Forge JIRA whether there is something like that and I found this issue created almost a year and a half ago:
> 
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152
> 
> I read in the description though, that the addon should be also able to setup groups and users inside a realm. Isn't that too server specific if the realm is not JDBC? Maybe we could continue the communication in the issue, so whoever is interested my add themselves as a watcher there?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ivan
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141012/49004fe0/attachment-0001.html 

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Mon Oct 13 03:00:56 2014
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:00:56 +0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Security addon in Forge
In-Reply-To: <EB659B37-841A-4D04-ADF0-C518B4C8D63E@redhat.com>
References: <CACYLA9Fmrd0D8XhSz-H2iuf0bz9Y_GzqjeuL=X0pUnimC_r0gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<EB659B37-841A-4D04-ADF0-C518B4C8D63E@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CACYLA9G5gKHCOYUGE90i7CJXpaTU_xutgFPJY837qZu9GihJkw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi George,

Thanks, I'll look at it!

Do you think it is reasonable to close
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152?

Regards,
Ivan



On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Have you checked the Picketlink addon?
>
>
> http://forge.jboss.org/addon/org.picketlink.tools.forge:picketlink-forge-addon
>
> Check it out, because I believe it already does some stuff that you are
> looking for.
>
> Em 12/10/2014, ?s 22:32, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I wanted to add a new addon to Forge that handles the Java EE security
> topics:
>
> - Add constraints to some resources
> - Setup authentication mechanism (form, basic, digest, etc.)
> - Assign realm to security constraints
> - Create security roles
> - If the realm is JDBC and JPA facet is installed, add an entity along
> with some named queries
>
> I looked in the Forge JIRA whether there is something like that and I
> found this issue created almost a year and a half ago:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152
>
> I read in the description though, that the addon should be also able to
> setup groups and users inside a realm. Isn't that too server specific if
> the realm is not JDBC? Maybe we could continue the communication in the
> issue, so whoever is interested my add themselves as a watcher there?
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141013/adda5879/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Mon Oct 13 03:22:58 2014
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 03:22:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [forge-dev] Security addon in Forge
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9G5gKHCOYUGE90i7CJXpaTU_xutgFPJY837qZu9GihJkw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACYLA9Fmrd0D8XhSz-H2iuf0bz9Y_GzqjeuL=X0pUnimC_r0gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<EB659B37-841A-4D04-ADF0-C518B4C8D63E@redhat.com>
	<CACYLA9G5gKHCOYUGE90i7CJXpaTU_xutgFPJY837qZu9GihJkw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <83EF71C7-11C8-4150-A4F0-6310A18D239E@redhat.com>

I am not sure, since the PicketLink  addon is specific to PicketLink, and not plain JavaEE security. Perhaps we need to introduce a new command in the javaee addon.



> Em 13/10/2014, ?s 10:01, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> Hi George,
> 
> Thanks, I'll look at it!
> 
> Do you think it is reasonable to close https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152?
> 
> Regards,
> Ivan
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Have you checked the Picketlink addon? 
>> 
>> http://forge.jboss.org/addon/org.picketlink.tools.forge:picketlink-forge-addon
>> 
>> Check it out, because I believe it already does some stuff that you are looking for.
>> 
>>> Em 12/10/2014, ?s 22:32, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>> 
>> 
>>> Hi folks,
>>> 
>>> I wanted to add a new addon to Forge that handles the Java EE security topics:
>>> 
>>> - Add constraints to some resources
>>> - Setup authentication mechanism (form, basic, digest, etc.)
>>> - Assign realm to security constraints
>>> - Create security roles
>>> - If the realm is JDBC and JPA facet is installed, add an entity along with some named queries
>>> 
>>> I looked in the Forge JIRA whether there is something like that and I found this issue created almost a year and a half ago:
>>> 
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152
>>> 
>>> I read in the description though, that the addon should be also able to setup groups and users inside a realm. Isn't that too server specific if the realm is not JDBC? Maybe we could continue the communication in the issue, so whoever is interested my add themselves as a watcher there?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ivan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141013/045e6457/attachment.html 

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Mon Oct 13 07:17:10 2014
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:17:10 +0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Security addon in Forge
In-Reply-To: <83EF71C7-11C8-4150-A4F0-6310A18D239E@redhat.com>
References: <CACYLA9Fmrd0D8XhSz-H2iuf0bz9Y_GzqjeuL=X0pUnimC_r0gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<EB659B37-841A-4D04-ADF0-C518B4C8D63E@redhat.com>
	<CACYLA9G5gKHCOYUGE90i7CJXpaTU_xutgFPJY837qZu9GihJkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<83EF71C7-11C8-4150-A4F0-6310A18D239E@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CACYLA9GrRg8xhqMBY3Fz=ukCmHtmayA574GKTOjGCQpjYH16Jg@mail.gmail.com>

OK, George, should I read your answers as: "Yes, Ivan, go on and implement
the security command(s) in the javaee addon. You may use the picketlink
addon as reference, but follow the spec" :)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
wrote:

> I am not sure, since the PicketLink  addon is specific to PicketLink, and
> not plain JavaEE security. Perhaps we need to introduce a new command in
> the javaee addon.
>
>
>
> Em 13/10/2014, ?s 10:01, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> Hi George,
>
> Thanks, I'll look at it!
>
> Do you think it is reasonable to close
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152?
>
> Regards,
> Ivan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Have you checked the Picketlink addon?
>>
>>
>> http://forge.jboss.org/addon/org.picketlink.tools.forge:picketlink-forge-addon
>>
>> Check it out, because I believe it already does some stuff that you are
>> looking for.
>>
>> Em 12/10/2014, ?s 22:32, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I wanted to add a new addon to Forge that handles the Java EE security
>> topics:
>>
>> - Add constraints to some resources
>> - Setup authentication mechanism (form, basic, digest, etc.)
>> - Assign realm to security constraints
>> - Create security roles
>> - If the realm is JDBC and JPA facet is installed, add an entity along
>> with some named queries
>>
>> I looked in the Forge JIRA whether there is something like that and I
>> found this issue created almost a year and a half ago:
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152
>>
>> I read in the description though, that the addon should be also able to
>> setup groups and users inside a realm. Isn't that too server specific if
>> the realm is not JDBC? Maybe we could continue the communication in the
>> issue, so whoever is interested my add themselves as a watcher there?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ivan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141013/f9a49583/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Mon Oct 13 08:18:40 2014
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:18:40 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [forge-dev] Security addon in Forge
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9GrRg8xhqMBY3Fz=ukCmHtmayA574GKTOjGCQpjYH16Jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACYLA9Fmrd0D8XhSz-H2iuf0bz9Y_GzqjeuL=X0pUnimC_r0gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<EB659B37-841A-4D04-ADF0-C518B4C8D63E@redhat.com>
	<CACYLA9G5gKHCOYUGE90i7CJXpaTU_xutgFPJY837qZu9GihJkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<83EF71C7-11C8-4150-A4F0-6310A18D239E@redhat.com>
	<CACYLA9GrRg8xhqMBY3Fz=ukCmHtmayA574GKTOjGCQpjYH16Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0C8651AA-1141-4C0A-AF81-FD85DC992ECA@redhat.com>

You are an awesome mind-reader :)



> Em 13/10/2014, ?s 14:17, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> OK, George, should I read your answers as: "Yes, Ivan, go on and implement the security command(s) in the javaee addon. You may use the picketlink addon as reference, but follow the spec" :)
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I am not sure, since the PicketLink  addon is specific to PicketLink, and not plain JavaEE security. Perhaps we need to introduce a new command in the javaee addon.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Em 13/10/2014, ?s 10:01, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>> 
>> 
>>> Hi George,
>>> 
>>> Thanks, I'll look at it!
>>> 
>>> Do you think it is reasonable to close https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Have you checked the Picketlink addon? 
>>>> 
>>>> http://forge.jboss.org/addon/org.picketlink.tools.forge:picketlink-forge-addon
>>>> 
>>>> Check it out, because I believe it already does some stuff that you are looking for.
>>>> 
>>>>> Em 12/10/2014, ?s 22:32, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I wanted to add a new addon to Forge that handles the Java EE security topics:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Add constraints to some resources
>>>>> - Setup authentication mechanism (form, basic, digest, etc.)
>>>>> - Assign realm to security constraints
>>>>> - Create security roles
>>>>> - If the realm is JDBC and JPA facet is installed, add an entity along with some named queries
>>>>> 
>>>>> I looked in the Forge JIRA whether there is something like that and I found this issue created almost a year and a half ago:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-152
>>>>> 
>>>>> I read in the description though, that the addon should be also able to setup groups and users inside a realm. Isn't that too server specific if the realm is not JDBC? Maybe we could continue the communication in the issue, so whoever is interested my add themselves as a watcher there?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141013/6cb31afa/attachment-0001.html 

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Mon Oct 13 15:20:58 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:20:58 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <CADjFuPo6LN7DNokcHhnpogDJw_u1M2RMiN=JKmBt+24w4rKAag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>
	<CADjFuPo6LN7DNokcHhnpogDJw_u1M2RMiN=JKmBt+24w4rKAag@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4HHbLTfZ2mWhygq2dj_3utXRuP5U0ZwTJ=M_GC8GWF36w@mail.gmail.com>

Hey Rafael, have you tried removing your ~/.forge/addons directory?

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hey guys, congratulations for the release but i'm having problems running
> forge 2.1.12 in eclipse Luna, it just hangs when i start forge, see video
> below:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3n1D7qYjM
>
> thanks in advance
>
> 2014-10-03 15:17 GMT-03:00 Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com>:
>
>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Daniel Cunha" <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>> *To: *"forge-dev List" <forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> *Sent: *Friday, October 3, 2014 9:02:55 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
>>
>> The new website is awesome! :)
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
>>> 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
>>>
>>> Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
>>>
>>> ~Lincoln
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>
> Rafael M. Pestano
>
> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
> Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
> http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
> @realpestano
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141013/d803220e/attachment.html 

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Mon Oct 13 15:21:32 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:21:32 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <CAEp_U4HHbLTfZ2mWhygq2dj_3utXRuP5U0ZwTJ=M_GC8GWF36w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>
	<CADjFuPo6LN7DNokcHhnpogDJw_u1M2RMiN=JKmBt+24w4rKAag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4HHbLTfZ2mWhygq2dj_3utXRuP5U0ZwTJ=M_GC8GWF36w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4GpQLc6yzxSBWyWXADUN9oh1j_nCTYmyR9Z4t1FSM8oFA@mail.gmail.com>

Any errors in your error console or eclipse logs?

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Rafael, have you tried removing your ~/.forge/addons directory?
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys, congratulations for the release but i'm having problems running
>> forge 2.1.12 in eclipse Luna, it just hangs when i start forge, see video
>> below:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3n1D7qYjM
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> 2014-10-03 15:17 GMT-03:00 Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com>:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *"Daniel Cunha" <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>> *To: *"forge-dev List" <forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> *Sent: *Friday, October 3, 2014 9:02:55 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
>>>
>>> The new website is awesome! :)
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
>>>> 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
>>>>
>>>> Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
>>>>
>>>> ~Lincoln
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>>> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>>
>> Rafael M. Pestano
>>
>> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
>> Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
>> http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
>> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
>> @realpestano
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141013/8644f9eb/attachment.html 

From rmpestano at gmail.com  Mon Oct 13 16:30:33 2014
From: rmpestano at gmail.com (Rafael Pestano)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:30:33 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <CAEp_U4GpQLc6yzxSBWyWXADUN9oh1j_nCTYmyR9Z4t1FSM8oFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>
	<CADjFuPo6LN7DNokcHhnpogDJw_u1M2RMiN=JKmBt+24w4rKAag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4HHbLTfZ2mWhygq2dj_3utXRuP5U0ZwTJ=M_GC8GWF36w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4GpQLc6yzxSBWyWXADUN9oh1j_nCTYmyR9Z4t1FSM8oFA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADjFuPrfAA7ScuJTLeYLn4LGetj+ExBkLq8JN_5edM20VqinwA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Lincoln,

yes, i did removed .forge folder.

The strange thing is that i've instaled jboss developer studio 8.0CR1 which
comes with forge 2.10.0 and got the same problem, so it must be something
on my environment.

As soon i get home i will hack a little bit and post here the result.

thanks.

2014-10-13 16:21 GMT-03:00 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>:

> Any errors in your error console or eclipse logs?
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Rafael, have you tried removing your ~/.forge/addons directory?
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys, congratulations for the release but i'm having problems
>>> running forge 2.1.12 in eclipse Luna, it just hangs when i start forge, see
>>> video below:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3n1D7qYjM
>>>
>>> thanks in advance
>>>
>>> 2014-10-03 15:17 GMT-03:00 Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *From: *"Daniel Cunha" <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>>> *To: *"forge-dev List" <forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> *Sent: *Friday, October 3, 2014 9:02:55 AM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
>>>>
>>>> The new website is awesome! :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
>>>>> 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
>>>>>
>>>>> Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
>>>>>
>>>>> ~Lincoln
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>>>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>>>> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>>>
>>> Rafael M. Pestano
>>>
>>> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
>>> Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
>>> http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
>>> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
>>> @realpestano
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org
>> "Simpler is better."
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
<http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,

Rafael M. Pestano

Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
@realpestano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141013/fa71a757/attachment-0001.html 

From forge-dev at lists.jboss.org  Tue Oct 14 09:49:50 2014
From: forge-dev at lists.jboss.org (forge-dev at lists.jboss.org)
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:49:50 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] =?utf-8?q?Ministerio_publico_federal_Intima=C3=A7?=
	=?utf-8?b?w6NvIGVsZXRyb25pY2EuICgxMjMzOSk=?=
Message-ID: <14132945900e03dfff016607c969a201867161532c@cpro23810>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141014/9d2e9f44/attachment.html 

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Tue Oct 14 19:29:48 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:29:48 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <CADjFuPrfAA7ScuJTLeYLn4LGetj+ExBkLq8JN_5edM20VqinwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>
	<CADjFuPo6LN7DNokcHhnpogDJw_u1M2RMiN=JKmBt+24w4rKAag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4HHbLTfZ2mWhygq2dj_3utXRuP5U0ZwTJ=M_GC8GWF36w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4GpQLc6yzxSBWyWXADUN9oh1j_nCTYmyR9Z4t1FSM8oFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADjFuPrfAA7ScuJTLeYLn4LGetj+ExBkLq8JN_5edM20VqinwA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4F4vRerrGN4cq-=T0b3T6=UNb8K_m2w2DYGxNs0gOBYQw@mail.gmail.com>

Hey Rafael,

Any luck? I can't reproduce this here (no surprise,) so I'm really curious
what's going on. Which version of Java are you using to launch Eclipse?

Thanks!
~Lincoln

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Lincoln,
>
> yes, i did removed .forge folder.
>
> The strange thing is that i've instaled jboss developer studio 8.0CR1
> which comes with forge 2.10.0 and got the same problem, so it must be
> something on my environment.
>
> As soon i get home i will hack a little bit and post here the result.
>
> thanks.
>
> 2014-10-13 16:21 GMT-03:00 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>:
>
> Any errors in your error console or eclipse logs?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Rafael, have you tried removing your ~/.forge/addons directory?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey guys, congratulations for the release but i'm having problems
>>>> running forge 2.1.12 in eclipse Luna, it just hangs when i start forge, see
>>>> video below:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3n1D7qYjM
>>>>
>>>> thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>> 2014-10-03 15:17 GMT-03:00 Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> *From: *"Daniel Cunha" <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>>>> *To: *"forge-dev List" <forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> *Sent: *Friday, October 3, 2014 9:02:55 AM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
>>>>>
>>>>> The new website is awesome! :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>>>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
>>>>>> 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~Lincoln
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>>>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>>>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>>>>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>>>>> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>>>>
>>>> Rafael M. Pestano
>>>>
>>>> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
>>>> Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
>>>> http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
>>>> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
>>>> @realpestano
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org
>> "Simpler is better."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>
> Rafael M. Pestano
>
> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
> Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
> http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
> @realpestano
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141014/e250931e/attachment.html 

From rmpestano at gmail.com  Wed Oct 15 09:31:58 2014
From: rmpestano at gmail.com (Rafael Pestano)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:31:58 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
In-Reply-To: <CAEp_U4F4vRerrGN4cq-=T0b3T6=UNb8K_m2w2DYGxNs0gOBYQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEp_U4HeMd9m6rJshzC_JHQwaGuQaWRV21cg=sEJpOz_YapTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45q3ejrzbLzkpFJwSpX3fqm2yS5VkM4mc=7ddZeE2uhsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1814686136.8801.1412360227041.JavaMail.rruss@MacBook-Pro.local>
	<CADjFuPo6LN7DNokcHhnpogDJw_u1M2RMiN=JKmBt+24w4rKAag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4HHbLTfZ2mWhygq2dj_3utXRuP5U0ZwTJ=M_GC8GWF36w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4GpQLc6yzxSBWyWXADUN9oh1j_nCTYmyR9Z4t1FSM8oFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADjFuPrfAA7ScuJTLeYLn4LGetj+ExBkLq8JN_5edM20VqinwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4F4vRerrGN4cq-=T0b3T6=UNb8K_m2w2DYGxNs0gOBYQw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADjFuPo9yjy-0gWKAqHkUVLkYm-vid--iU4+ecS9VkbSUTQitA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Lincoln,

didin't investigate anymore, i'm preparing for a conference which starts
tomorrow, i'll use forge1 there but i promisse in the next oportunity i'll
use forge 2 ;)

I will give an arquillian talk with the help of forge, my favourite
projetcs ;)

PS: i've already seen that arquillian-addon got some updates so one more
reason tu use F2

2014-10-14 20:29 GMT-03:00 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>:

> Hey Rafael,
>
> Any luck? I can't reproduce this here (no surprise,) so I'm really curious
> what's going on. Which version of Java are you using to launch Eclipse?
>
> Thanks!
> ~Lincoln
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lincoln,
>>
>> yes, i did removed .forge folder.
>>
>> The strange thing is that i've instaled jboss developer studio 8.0CR1
>> which comes with forge 2.10.0 and got the same problem, so it must be
>> something on my environment.
>>
>> As soon i get home i will hack a little bit and post here the result.
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>> 2014-10-13 16:21 GMT-03:00 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Any errors in your error console or eclipse logs?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Rafael, have you tried removing your ~/.forge/addons directory?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey guys, congratulations for the release but i'm having problems
>>>>> running forge 2.1.12 in eclipse Luna, it just hangs when i start forge, see
>>>>> video below:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3n1D7qYjM
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks in advance
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-10-03 15:17 GMT-03:00 Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *"Daniel Cunha" <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>>>>> *To: *"forge-dev List" <forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>> *Sent: *Friday, October 3, 2014 9:02:55 AM
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [forge-dev] Forge 2.12.0.Final Released!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new website is awesome! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>>>>> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am happy to announce the immediate availability of JBoss Forge
>>>>>>> 2.12.0.Final, our most feature packed release yet!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go grab it at http://forge.jboss.org !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~Lincoln
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>>>>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>>>>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>>>>>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>>>>>> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafael M. Pestano
>>>>>
>>>>> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
>>>>> Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
>>>>> http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
>>>>> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
>>>>> @realpestano
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>>
>> Rafael M. Pestano
>>
>> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
>> Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
>> http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
>> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
>> @realpestano
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
<http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,

Rafael M. Pestano

Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
Graduando em Ci?ncia da Computa??o UFRGS
http://conventionsframework.org <http://conventions.github.io/home/>
http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
@realpestano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141015/7ad7a570/attachment-0001.html 

From devanshu911 at gmail.com  Thu Oct 23 12:40:43 2014
From: devanshu911 at gmail.com (Devanshu Singh)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:10:43 +0530
Subject: [forge-dev] Install Forge from CURL (FORGE-1896)
Message-ID: <CAE8ah412iG5vM7VDqT0ey+E8y9Jk74sBBxAHdow_JYPrV=iRjQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello!

I?ve been working on the Issue:Install Forge from CURL
(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1896)


While writing the script I found that the installer extracts to the name
:?forge-distribution-2.12.1.Final?. Meanwhile reading the installation
documents on the forge website(http://forge.jboss.org/document/installation),
I found that the install location suggested is ?~/forge/? (maintaining the
bin folder directly inside this).
Should I rename the extracted zip archive to ?forge? inside the script ? or
should I modify the path variable?
Please correct me if I am wrong anywhere or if there is an alternate way to
handle this. (This is my first outing with open source!).

Devanshu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141023/f11ea12c/attachment.html 

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Thu Oct 23 17:17:54 2014
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:17:54 +0200
Subject: [forge-dev] Install Forge from CURL (FORGE-1896)
In-Reply-To: <CAE8ah412iG5vM7VDqT0ey+E8y9Jk74sBBxAHdow_JYPrV=iRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE8ah412iG5vM7VDqT0ey+E8y9Jk74sBBxAHdow_JYPrV=iRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACYLA9FfyKrwqAgZ17NvVXQqSYnk6h7m31tEoF5Jkw1DUtr69A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Devanshu,

I think that the documentation seems a bit confusing. Actually, you can
extract Forge to whatever directory you like. Then you should just add that
directory to your path.

IMHO, the docu would sound a bit more clear if the sentence

*On Unix based operating systems, this typically means editing your
~/.bashrc or ~/.profile; you will need to the following entries:*

was changed to something like:

*On Unix based operating systems, this typically means editing your
~/.bashrc or ~/.profile. Suppose you have extracted Forge under ~/forge
directory. Then you will need to add the following entries:*

And still the question remains: if you extract directly the zip under
~/forge, then your FORGE_HOME should be (as you noticed)
~/forge/forge-distribution-2.12.1.Final. So even the above explanation is
not the best...

Lincoln, George, what do you think?

Cheers,
Ivan

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Devanshu Singh <devanshu911 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I?ve been working on the Issue:Install Forge from CURL
> (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1896)
>
>
> While writing the script I found that the installer extracts to the name
> :?forge-distribution-2.12.1.Final?. Meanwhile reading the installation
> documents on the forge website(
> http://forge.jboss.org/document/installation), I found that the install
> location suggested is ?~/forge/? (maintaining the bin folder directly
> inside this).
> Should I rename the extracted zip archive to ?forge? inside the script ?
> or should I modify the path variable?
> Please correct me if I am wrong anywhere or if there is an alternate way
> to handle this. (This is my first outing with open source!).
>
> Devanshu
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141023/1e740700/attachment.html 

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Sat Oct 25 18:36:39 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 18:36:39 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Install Forge from CURL (FORGE-1896)
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9FfyKrwqAgZ17NvVXQqSYnk6h7m31tEoF5Jkw1DUtr69A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE8ah412iG5vM7VDqT0ey+E8y9Jk74sBBxAHdow_JYPrV=iRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FfyKrwqAgZ17NvVXQqSYnk6h7m31tEoF5Jkw1DUtr69A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4ET18XHS=4gHu3sq9XxAEYuUtxLchZfvdmxXks62PyNhQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hey Ivan,

I think your update makes more sense. Our current docs don't do a very good
job of explaining that this is just an example, and is also optional.

~Lincoln

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Devanshu,
>
> I think that the documentation seems a bit confusing. Actually, you can
> extract Forge to whatever directory you like. Then you should just add that
> directory to your path.
>
> IMHO, the docu would sound a bit more clear if the sentence
>
> *On Unix based operating systems, this typically means editing your
> ~/.bashrc or ~/.profile; you will need to the following entries:*
>
> was changed to something like:
>
> *On Unix based operating systems, this typically means editing your
> ~/.bashrc or ~/.profile. Suppose you have extracted Forge under ~/forge
> directory. Then you will need to add the following entries:*
>
> And still the question remains: if you extract directly the zip under
> ~/forge, then your FORGE_HOME should be (as you noticed)
> ~/forge/forge-distribution-2.12.1.Final. So even the above explanation is
> not the best...
>
> Lincoln, George, what do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Devanshu Singh <devanshu911 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I?ve been working on the Issue:Install Forge from CURL
>> (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1896)
>>
>>
>> While writing the script I found that the installer extracts to the name
>> :?forge-distribution-2.12.1.Final?. Meanwhile reading the installation
>> documents on the forge website(
>> http://forge.jboss.org/document/installation), I found that the install
>> location suggested is ?~/forge/? (maintaining the bin folder directly
>> inside this).
>> Should I rename the extracted zip archive to ?forge? inside the script ?
>> or should I modify the path variable?
>> Please correct me if I am wrong anywhere or if there is an alternate way
>> to handle this. (This is my first outing with open source!).
>>
>> Devanshu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141025/d86c7e16/attachment.html 

From antonio.mailing at gmail.com  Sun Oct 26 07:23:37 2014
From: antonio.mailing at gmail.com (Antonio Goncalves)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:23:37 +0100
Subject: [forge-dev]  How to have multiple choices in a Forge command ?
Message-ID: <CAKawoOaePpjGfsAOTiq4+zzCK5oJOOJX_oTvSk-1vudk=ewEWg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi guys,

I want to work on "Being able to add a listener when creating a new JPA
entity "(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2094). Basically, when I
create a new JPA entity, I want to be able to add as many listeners as I
want.

jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener

Would generate :

@Entity
@EntityListeners({ DebugListener.class, AuditListener })

public class MyEntity
{
}


How do I do to be able to have several choices on an attribute ? I only
know how to manage one value but not several one. Is it doable ? Any
exemple in any Forge command ?

Thanks

-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
 | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France
<http://www.devoxx.fr/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141026/feb5d871/attachment.html 

From antonio.mailing at gmail.com  Sun Oct 26 07:27:02 2014
From: antonio.mailing at gmail.com (Antonio Goncalves)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:27:02 +0100
Subject: [forge-dev] How to have multiple choices in a Forge command ?
In-Reply-To: <CAKawoOaePpjGfsAOTiq4+zzCK5oJOOJX_oTvSk-1vudk=ewEWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKawoOaePpjGfsAOTiq4+zzCK5oJOOJX_oTvSk-1vudk=ewEWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKawoOaP-Me-zcMn3GwJXuutFt1Kn=Wz7z3nMPVs54V-dBDSng@mail.gmail.com>

And I have the same need for "Being able to create a new JPA listener" (
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2093) :

jpa-new-listener --named MyListener --lifecycle PRE_PERSIST,
POST_UPDATE, POST_REMOVE


2014-10-26 12:23 GMT+01:00 Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com>:

> Hi guys,
>
> I want to work on "Being able to add a listener when creating a new JPA
> entity "(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2094). Basically, when I
> create a new JPA entity, I want to be able to add as many listeners as I
> want.
>
> jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener
>
> Would generate :
>
> @Entity
> @EntityListeners({ DebugListener.class, AuditListener })
>
> public class MyEntity
> {
> }
>
>
> How do I do to be able to have several choices on an attribute ? I only
> know how to manage one value but not several one. Is it doable ? Any
> exemple in any Forge command ?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>



-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
 | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France
<http://www.devoxx.fr/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141026/7d3a8b42/attachment-0001.html 

From danielsoro at gmail.com  Sun Oct 26 08:06:23 2014
From: danielsoro at gmail.com (Daniel Cunha)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:06:23 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] How to have multiple choices in a Forge command ?
In-Reply-To: <CAKawoOaP-Me-zcMn3GwJXuutFt1Kn=Wz7z3nMPVs54V-dBDSng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKawoOaePpjGfsAOTiq4+zzCK5oJOOJX_oTvSk-1vudk=ewEWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKawoOaP-Me-zcMn3GwJXuutFt1Kn=Wz7z3nMPVs54V-dBDSng@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHLHu477N3Fp7XZG_=hYn0otenxu_wPL_029fQaf4rsUojfNWg@mail.gmail.com>

Hiho Antonio,

jpa-new-listener --named MyListener --lifecycle PRE_PERSIST,
POST_UPDATE, POST_REMOVE

Maybe, DeltaSpike Addon can help you.
It?s simple and easy to understand.

In DeltaSpike Addon you can do that:

deltaspike-install-modules[1] --modules JPA JSF Servlet Data

For this case:

jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener

I don?t have a sample for it or I don?t remeber now.

[1]
https://github.com/rafabene/addon-deltaspike/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/forge/addon/deltaspike/commands/DeltaSpikeInstallModulesCommand.java

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Antonio Goncalves <
antonio.mailing at gmail.com> wrote:

And I have the same need for "Being able to create a new JPA listener" (
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2093) :
>
> jpa-new-listener --named MyListener --lifecycle PRE_PERSIST, POST_UPDATE, POST_REMOVE
>
>
> 2014-10-26 12:23 GMT+01:00 Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I want to work on "Being able to add a listener when creating a new JPA
>> entity "(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2094). Basically, when I
>> create a new JPA entity, I want to be able to add as many listeners as I
>> want.
>>
>> jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener
>>
>> Would generate :
>>
>> @Entity
>> @EntityListeners({ DebugListener.class, AuditListener })
>>
>> public class MyEntity
>> {
>> }
>>
>>
>> How do I do to be able to have several choices on an attribute ? I only
>> know how to manage one value but not several one. Is it doable ? Any
>> exemple in any Forge command ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
?
-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141026/38c890f8/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Sun Oct 26 09:07:09 2014
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:07:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [forge-dev] How to have multiple choices in a Forge command ?
In-Reply-To: <CAHLHu477N3Fp7XZG_=hYn0otenxu_wPL_029fQaf4rsUojfNWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKawoOaePpjGfsAOTiq4+zzCK5oJOOJX_oTvSk-1vudk=ewEWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKawoOaP-Me-zcMn3GwJXuutFt1Kn=Wz7z3nMPVs54V-dBDSng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu477N3Fp7XZG_=hYn0otenxu_wPL_029fQaf4rsUojfNWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <64188F7C-7D14-4A65-9384-8C86E43E59C0@redhat.com>

Hi Antonio,

As Daniel said, you need to use UISelectMany (eg: https://github.com/rafabene/addon-deltaspike/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/forge/addon/deltaspike/commands/AbstractDeltaSpikeCommand.java). See the UI addon documentation about the possible UI types: http://forge.jboss.org/addon/org.jboss.forge.addon:ui



> Em 26/10/2014, ?s 10:06, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> Hiho Antonio,
> 
> jpa-new-listener --named MyListener --lifecycle PRE_PERSIST, POST_UPDATE, POST_REMOVE
> Maybe, DeltaSpike Addon can help you.
> It?s simple and easy to understand.
> 
> In DeltaSpike Addon you can do that:
> 
> deltaspike-install-modules[1] --modules JPA JSF Servlet Data
> For this case:
> 
> jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener
> I don?t have a sample for it or I don?t remeber now.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/rafabene/addon-deltaspike/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/forge/addon/deltaspike/commands/DeltaSpikeInstallModulesCommand.java
> 
>> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> And I have the same need for "Being able to create a new JPA listener" (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2093) :
>> jpa-new-listener --named MyListener --lifecycle PRE_PERSIST, POST_UPDATE, POST_REMOVE
>> 
>> 2014-10-26 12:23 GMT+01:00 Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> 
>>> I want to work on "Being able to add a listener when creating a new JPA entity "(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2094). Basically, when I create a new JPA entity, I want to be able to add as many listeners as I want.
>>> 
>>> jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener
>>> Would generate :
>>> @Entity
>>> @EntityListeners({ DebugListener.class, AuditListener })
>>> public class MyEntity
>>> {
>>> }
>>> 
>>> How do I do to be able to have several choices on an attribute ? I only know how to manage one value but not several one. Is it doable ? Any exemple in any Forge command ?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Antonio Goncalves 
>>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>> 
>>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Antonio Goncalves 
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>> 
>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> 
> ?
> -- 
> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha 
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141026/d312fb3a/attachment-0001.html 

From antonio.mailing at gmail.com  Mon Oct 27 05:58:01 2014
From: antonio.mailing at gmail.com (Antonio Goncalves)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:58:01 +0100
Subject: [forge-dev]  Getting lost in UICommands class hierarchy
Message-ID: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

I'm trying to add more commands in Forge... but I have to say, I'm a bit
lost. So, I've made a quick UML class diagram.

As you can see in the attached diagram (UIForge.png), most of the Java EE
commands extend AbstractJavaEECommand, which makes sense. But not all of
them (NewBeanCommand (CDI), ValidationNewAnnotationCommandImpl,
NewQualifierCommand....). And some times you have an extra level of
abstraction (AbstractFacesCommand). Same for the Java commands.
JavaClassCommandImpl extend AbstractJavaSourceCommand but
JavaAddAnnotationCommand and JavaFieldCommand inherit from
AbstractProjectCommand.


Then, when you dive into a command (UIForgeStructure.pgn), some commands
use interface and implementation (see in the second
diagram JavaAddAnnotationCommandImpl
implementing JavaAddAnnotationCommand), some don't
(e.g. NewQualifierCommand). Is there a reason ?


Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it would be (HowIseeIt.png) :
under AbstractJavaEECommand you have a set
of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, AbstractJPACommand....
each implementing PrerequisiteCommandsProvider (this way, each command sets
up its own pre-requisite). And then, under AbstractCDICommand you have all
the NewQualifierCommand, NewBeanCommand....


What do you think ? Am I the only one getting a little bit lost ;o)

What do you think of re-structuring the class hierarchy ?

-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
 | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France
<http://www.devoxx.fr/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/b12da7d1/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: UIForge.png
Type: image/png
Size: 81952 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/b12da7d1/attachment-0003.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: UIForgeStructure.png
Type: image/png
Size: 23879 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/b12da7d1/attachment-0004.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: HowIseeIt.png
Type: image/png
Size: 75237 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/b12da7d1/attachment-0005.png 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Mon Oct 27 08:35:01 2014
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 05:35:01 -0700
Subject: [forge-dev] Getting lost in UICommands class hierarchy
In-Reply-To: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <544E3BF5.1030304@redhat.com>

Hi Antonio,

Yeah, I think that's fine. The idea of having an interface is to 
reference the next command in the next() method (or as a prerequisite), 
but that is optional.
I think that would be a good idea, if these specializations had enough 
code to justify their existence.


On 10/27/2014 02:58 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to add more commands in Forge... but I have to say, I'm a 
> bit lost. So, I've made a quick UML class diagram.
>
> As you can see in the attached diagram (UIForge.png), most of the Java 
> EE commands extend AbstractJavaEECommand, which makes sense. But not 
> all of them (NewBeanCommand (CDI), ValidationNewAnnotationCommandImpl, 
> NewQualifierCommand....). And some times you have an extra level of 
> abstraction (AbstractFacesCommand). Same for the Java commands. 
> JavaClassCommandImpl extend AbstractJavaSourceCommand but 
> JavaAddAnnotationCommand and JavaFieldCommand inherit from 
> AbstractProjectCommand.
>
>
> Then, when you dive into a command (UIForgeStructure.pgn), some 
> commands use interface and implementation (see in the second 
> diagram JavaAddAnnotationCommandImpl 
> implementing JavaAddAnnotationCommand), some don't 
> (e.g. NewQualifierCommand). Is there a reason ?
>
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it would be (HowIseeIt.png) 
> : under AbstractJavaEECommand you have a set 
> of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, AbstractJPACommand.... 
> each implementing PrerequisiteCommandsProvider (this way, each command 
> sets up its own pre-requisite). And then, under AbstractCDICommand you 
> have all the NewQualifierCommand, NewBeanCommand....
>
>
> What do you think ? Am I the only one getting a little bit lost ;o)
>
> What do you think of re-structuring the class hierarchy ?
>
> -- 
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter 
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn 
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG 
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/9ace1222/attachment.html 

From antonio.mailing at gmail.com  Mon Oct 27 08:41:05 2014
From: antonio.mailing at gmail.com (Antonio Goncalves)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:41:05 +0100
Subject: [forge-dev] Getting lost in UICommands class hierarchy
In-Reply-To: <544E3BF5.1030304@redhat.com>
References: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<544E3BF5.1030304@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAKawoObvYJdJH-W+ax7h64-mo48iaX9jX3AKR1Nd1KhFSckxTQ@mail.gmail.com>

The extra layer of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand,
AbstractJPACommand (notice that this layer already exists for JSF) is
justified by overriding isProjectRequired and getPrerequisiteCommands (all
the Java EE commands need a project and need to be setup, see the code
below).

Then, if you say that the interface is optional, I would get rid of it.

All in all, I think that homogenize the code is very important for new
comers (like me). Creating a new command is, mostly, copy/paste + adding
some specific logic. And depending which class you copy/paste, you end up
with very different code.

Antonio


@Override
*protected boolean *isProjectRequired()
{
   *return true*;
}
   @Override
   public NavigationResult getPrerequisiteCommands(UIContext context)
   {
      NavigationResultBuilder builder = NavigationResultBuilder.create();
      Project project = getSelectedProject(context);
      if (project != null)
      {
         if (!project.hasFacet(CDIFacet.class))
         {
            builder.add(CDISetupCommand.class);
         }
      }
      return builder.build();
   }


2014-10-27 13:35 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:

>  Hi Antonio,
>
> Yeah, I think that's fine. The idea of having an interface is to reference
> the next command in the next() method (or as a prerequisite), but that is
> optional.
> I think that would be a good idea, if these specializations had enough
> code to justify their existence.
>
>
>
> On 10/27/2014 02:58 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
>  Hi all,
>
>  I'm trying to add more commands in Forge... but I have to say, I'm a bit
> lost. So, I've made a quick UML class diagram.
>
>  As you can see in the attached diagram (UIForge.png), most of the Java
> EE commands extend AbstractJavaEECommand, which makes sense. But not all of
> them (NewBeanCommand (CDI), ValidationNewAnnotationCommandImpl,
> NewQualifierCommand....). And some times you have an extra level of
> abstraction (AbstractFacesCommand). Same for the Java commands.
> JavaClassCommandImpl extend AbstractJavaSourceCommand but
> JavaAddAnnotationCommand and JavaFieldCommand inherit from
> AbstractProjectCommand.
>
>
>  Then, when you dive into a command (UIForgeStructure.pgn), some commands
> use interface and implementation (see in the second
> diagram JavaAddAnnotationCommandImpl
> implementing JavaAddAnnotationCommand), some don't
> (e.g. NewQualifierCommand). Is there a reason ?
>
>
>  Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it would be (HowIseeIt.png) :
> under AbstractJavaEECommand you have a set
> of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, AbstractJPACommand....
> each implementing PrerequisiteCommandsProvider (this way, each command sets
> up its own pre-requisite). And then, under AbstractCDICommand you have all
> the NewQualifierCommand, NewBeanCommand....
>
>
>  What do you think ? Am I the only one getting a little bit lost ;o)
>
>  What do you think of re-structuring the class hierarchy ?
>
>  --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
 | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France
<http://www.devoxx.fr/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/1634de00/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Mon Oct 27 08:43:05 2014
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:43:05 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] Getting lost in UICommands class hierarchy
In-Reply-To: <CAKawoObvYJdJH-W+ax7h64-mo48iaX9jX3AKR1Nd1KhFSckxTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>	<544E3BF5.1030304@redhat.com>
	<CAKawoObvYJdJH-W+ax7h64-mo48iaX9jX3AKR1Nd1KhFSckxTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <544E3DD9.1070604@redhat.com>

Great, so +1 to that.

On 10/27/2014 10:41 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
> The extra layer of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, 
> AbstractJPACommand (notice that this layer already exists for JSF) is 
> justified by overriding isProjectRequired and getPrerequisiteCommands 
> (all the Java EE commands need a project and need to be setup, see the 
> code below).
>
> Then, if you say that the interface is optional, I would get rid of it.
>
> All in all, I think that homogenize the code is very important for new 
> comers (like me). Creating a new command is, mostly, copy/paste + 
> adding some specific logic. And depending which class you copy/paste, 
> you end up with very different code.
>
> Antonio
>
>
> @Override
> *protected boolean *isProjectRequired()
> {
> *return true*;
> }
>
>    @Override
>    public NavigationResult getPrerequisiteCommands(UIContext context)
>    {
>       NavigationResultBuilder builder = NavigationResultBuilder.create();
>       Project project = getSelectedProject(context);
>       if (project != null)
>       {
>          if (!project.hasFacet(CDIFacet.class))
>          {
>             builder.add(CDISetupCommand.class);
>          }
>       }
>       return builder.build();
>    }
>
>
> 2014-10-27 13:35 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ggastald at redhat.com>>:
>
>     Hi Antonio,
>
>     Yeah, I think that's fine. The idea of having an interface is to
>     reference the next command in the next() method (or as a
>     prerequisite), but that is optional.
>     I think that would be a good idea, if these specializations had
>     enough code to justify their existence.
>
>
>
>     On 10/27/2014 02:58 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     I'm trying to add more commands in Forge... but I have to say,
>>     I'm a bit lost. So, I've made a quick UML class diagram.
>>
>>     As you can see in the attached diagram (UIForge.png), most of the
>>     Java EE commands extend AbstractJavaEECommand, which makes sense.
>>     But not all of them (NewBeanCommand (CDI),
>>     ValidationNewAnnotationCommandImpl, NewQualifierCommand....). And
>>     some times you have an extra level of abstraction
>>     (AbstractFacesCommand). Same for the Java commands.
>>     JavaClassCommandImpl extend AbstractJavaSourceCommand but
>>     JavaAddAnnotationCommand and JavaFieldCommand inherit from
>>     AbstractProjectCommand.
>>
>>
>>     Then, when you dive into a command (UIForgeStructure.pgn), some
>>     commands use interface and implementation (see in the second
>>     diagram JavaAddAnnotationCommandImpl
>>     implementing JavaAddAnnotationCommand), some don't
>>     (e.g. NewQualifierCommand). Is there a reason ?
>>
>>
>>     Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it would be
>>     (HowIseeIt.png) : under AbstractJavaEECommand you have a set
>>     of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, AbstractJPACommand....
>>     each implementing PrerequisiteCommandsProvider (this way, each
>>     command sets up its own pre-requisite). And then,
>>     under AbstractCDICommand you have all
>>     the NewQualifierCommand, NewBeanCommand....
>>
>>
>>     What do you think ? Am I the only one getting a little bit lost ;o)
>>
>>     What do you think of re-structuring the class hierarchy ?
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Antonio Goncalves
>>     Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>>     Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>>     <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>>     <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>>     <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     forge-dev mailing list
>>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     forge-dev mailing list
>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter 
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn 
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG 
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/c773f758/attachment-0001.html 

From antonio.mailing at gmail.com  Mon Oct 27 08:49:15 2014
From: antonio.mailing at gmail.com (Antonio Goncalves)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:49:15 +0100
Subject: [forge-dev] Getting lost in UICommands class hierarchy
In-Reply-To: <544E3DD9.1070604@redhat.com>
References: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<544E3BF5.1030304@redhat.com>
	<CAKawoObvYJdJH-W+ax7h64-mo48iaX9jX3AKR1Nd1KhFSckxTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<544E3DD9.1070604@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAKawoOZhWd5CQ=dbFCKqtEyMOExQ_H0v3O-H9O=0gYNZt5o14g@mail.gmail.com>

This refactoring is quite important, we should talk about this during the
next meeting. I would be more than happy to try to do it, but I fear to
break any tests or backward compatibility issue...

2014-10-27 13:43 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:

>  Great, so +1 to that.
>
>
> On 10/27/2014 10:41 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
> The extra layer of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand,
> AbstractJPACommand (notice that this layer already exists for JSF) is
> justified by overriding isProjectRequired and getPrerequisiteCommands (all
> the Java EE commands need a project and need to be setup, see the code
> below).
>
>  Then, if you say that the interface is optional, I would get rid of it.
>
>  All in all, I think that homogenize the code is very important for new
> comers (like me). Creating a new command is, mostly, copy/paste + adding
> some specific logic. And depending which class you copy/paste, you end up
> with very different code.
>
>  Antonio
>
>
>  @Override
> *protected boolean *isProjectRequired()
> {
>    *return true*;
> }
>     @Override
>    public NavigationResult getPrerequisiteCommands(UIContext context)
>    {
>       NavigationResultBuilder builder = NavigationResultBuilder.create();
>       Project project = getSelectedProject(context);
>       if (project != null)
>       {
>          if (!project.hasFacet(CDIFacet.class))
>          {
>             builder.add(CDISetupCommand.class);
>          }
>       }
>       return builder.build();
>    }
>
>
> 2014-10-27 13:35 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:
>
>>  Hi Antonio,
>>
>> Yeah, I think that's fine. The idea of having an interface is to
>> reference the next command in the next() method (or as a prerequisite), but
>> that is optional.
>> I think that would be a good idea, if these specializations had enough
>> code to justify their existence.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/2014 02:58 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>>
>>   Hi all,
>>
>>  I'm trying to add more commands in Forge... but I have to say, I'm a
>> bit lost. So, I've made a quick UML class diagram.
>>
>>  As you can see in the attached diagram (UIForge.png), most of the Java
>> EE commands extend AbstractJavaEECommand, which makes sense. But not all of
>> them (NewBeanCommand (CDI), ValidationNewAnnotationCommandImpl,
>> NewQualifierCommand....). And some times you have an extra level of
>> abstraction (AbstractFacesCommand). Same for the Java commands.
>> JavaClassCommandImpl extend AbstractJavaSourceCommand but
>> JavaAddAnnotationCommand and JavaFieldCommand inherit from
>> AbstractProjectCommand.
>>
>>
>>  Then, when you dive into a command (UIForgeStructure.pgn), some
>> commands use interface and implementation (see in the second
>> diagram JavaAddAnnotationCommandImpl
>> implementing JavaAddAnnotationCommand), some don't
>> (e.g. NewQualifierCommand). Is there a reason ?
>>
>>
>>  Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it would be (HowIseeIt.png)
>> : under AbstractJavaEECommand you have a set
>> of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, AbstractJPACommand....
>> each implementing PrerequisiteCommandsProvider (this way, each command sets
>> up its own pre-requisite). And then, under AbstractCDICommand you have all
>> the NewQualifierCommand, NewBeanCommand....
>>
>>
>>  What do you think ? Am I the only one getting a little bit lost ;o)
>>
>>  What do you think of re-structuring the class hierarchy ?
>>
>>  --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
 | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France
<http://www.devoxx.fr/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/6e100f51/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Mon Oct 27 09:00:41 2014
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:00:41 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] Getting lost in UICommands class hierarchy
In-Reply-To: <CAKawoOZhWd5CQ=dbFCKqtEyMOExQ_H0v3O-H9O=0gYNZt5o14g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>	<544E3BF5.1030304@redhat.com>	<CAKawoObvYJdJH-W+ax7h64-mo48iaX9jX3AKR1Nd1KhFSckxTQ@mail.gmail.com>	<544E3DD9.1070604@redhat.com>
	<CAKawoOZhWd5CQ=dbFCKqtEyMOExQ_H0v3O-H9O=0gYNZt5o14g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <544E41F9.1050809@redhat.com>

Agreed. Let's discuss about this in the next meeting.

On 10/27/2014 10:49 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
> This refactoring is quite important, we should talk about this during 
> the next meeting. I would be more than happy to try to do it, but I 
> fear to break any tests or backward compatibility issue...
>
> 2014-10-27 13:43 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ggastald at redhat.com>>:
>
>     Great, so +1 to that.
>
>
>     On 10/27/2014 10:41 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>>     The extra layer of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand,
>>     AbstractJPACommand (notice that this layer already exists for
>>     JSF) is justified by overriding isProjectRequired
>>     and getPrerequisiteCommands (all the Java EE commands need a
>>     project and need to be setup, see the code below).
>>
>>     Then, if you say that the interface is optional, I would get rid
>>     of it.
>>
>>     All in all, I think that homogenize the code is very important
>>     for new comers (like me). Creating a new command is, mostly,
>>     copy/paste + adding some specific logic. And depending which
>>     class you copy/paste, you end up with very different code.
>>
>>     Antonio
>>
>>
>>     @Override
>>     *protected boolean *isProjectRequired()
>>     {
>>     *return true*;
>>     }
>>
>>        @Override
>>        public NavigationResult getPrerequisiteCommands(UIContext context)
>>        {
>>           NavigationResultBuilder builder =
>>     NavigationResultBuilder.create();
>>           Project project = getSelectedProject(context);
>>           if (project != null)
>>           {
>>              if (!project.hasFacet(CDIFacet.class))
>>              {
>>     builder.add(CDISetupCommand.class);
>>              }
>>           }
>>           return builder.build();
>>        }
>>
>>
>>     2014-10-27 13:35 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com
>>     <mailto:ggastald at redhat.com>>:
>>
>>         Hi Antonio,
>>
>>         Yeah, I think that's fine. The idea of having an interface is
>>         to reference the next command in the next() method (or as a
>>         prerequisite), but that is optional.
>>         I think that would be a good idea, if these specializations
>>         had enough code to justify their existence.
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 10/27/2014 02:58 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>>>         Hi all,
>>>
>>>         I'm trying to add more commands in Forge... but I have to
>>>         say, I'm a bit lost. So, I've made a quick UML class diagram.
>>>
>>>         As you can see in the attached diagram (UIForge.png), most
>>>         of the Java EE commands extend AbstractJavaEECommand, which
>>>         makes sense. But not all of them (NewBeanCommand (CDI),
>>>         ValidationNewAnnotationCommandImpl,
>>>         NewQualifierCommand....). And some times you have an extra
>>>         level of abstraction (AbstractFacesCommand). Same for the
>>>         Java commands. JavaClassCommandImpl extend
>>>         AbstractJavaSourceCommand but JavaAddAnnotationCommand and
>>>         JavaFieldCommand inherit from AbstractProjectCommand.
>>>
>>>
>>>         Then, when you dive into a command (UIForgeStructure.pgn),
>>>         some commands use interface and implementation (see in the
>>>         second diagram JavaAddAnnotationCommandImpl
>>>         implementing JavaAddAnnotationCommand), some don't
>>>         (e.g. NewQualifierCommand). Is there a reason ?
>>>
>>>
>>>         Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it would be
>>>         (HowIseeIt.png) : under AbstractJavaEECommand you have a set
>>>         of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, AbstractJPACommand....
>>>         each implementing PrerequisiteCommandsProvider (this way,
>>>         each command sets up its own pre-requisite). And then,
>>>         under AbstractCDICommand you have all
>>>         the NewQualifierCommand, NewBeanCommand....
>>>
>>>
>>>         What do you think ? Am I the only one getting a little bit
>>>         lost ;o)
>>>
>>>         What do you think of re-structuring the class hierarchy ?
>>>
>>>         -- 
>>>         Antonio Goncalves
>>>         Software architect and Java Champion
>>>
>>>         Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>>>         <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>>>         <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>>>         <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France
>>>         <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         forge-dev mailing list
>>>         forge-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         forge-dev mailing list
>>         forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Antonio Goncalves
>>     Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>>     Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>>     <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>>     <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>>     <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     forge-dev mailing list
>>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     forge-dev mailing list
>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter 
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn 
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG 
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/2f253e0b/attachment-0001.html 

From danielsoro at gmail.com  Mon Oct 27 18:52:21 2014
From: danielsoro at gmail.com (Daniel Cunha)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:52:21 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] IntelliJ plugin build
Message-ID: <CAHLHu44AOePGvmkjBkgjS2vg08hY245kF5GbyuCfReaayJbhTA@mail.gmail.com>

Hiho Folks,

I try create intellij dependency, but I had a problem:

My shell:
08:36:57 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$ echo $SHELL
/bin/bash

I try did that:
08:37:01 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$
./install-intellij-libs.sh 13.1.5 ~/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
Installing IntelliJ artifacts to Maven local repository
IntelliJ home: /home/soro/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
./install-intellij-libs.sh: 26: ./install-intellij-libs.sh: Syntax error:
"(" unexpected (expecting "done")

But that mode, work well:
08:50:47 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$ bash
install-intellij-libs.sh 13.1.5 ~/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/

Some idea about it?

-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/3cb76a68/attachment.html 

From danielsoro at gmail.com  Mon Oct 27 19:03:57 2014
From: danielsoro at gmail.com (Daniel Cunha)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:03:57 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] IntelliJ plugin build
In-Reply-To: <CAHLHu44AOePGvmkjBkgjS2vg08hY245kF5GbyuCfReaayJbhTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHLHu44AOePGvmkjBkgjS2vg08hY245kF5GbyuCfReaayJbhTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHLHu45F6UfS2n2On5tvjPMDdJWA0r5T4S7v0LJ6WjwBZtDFeg@mail.gmail.com>

Results :
Failed tests:
  ForgeServiceTest.testCommandLoading:51 null

Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0


On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hiho Folks,
>
> I try create intellij dependency, but I had a problem:
>
> My shell:
> 08:36:57 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$ echo $SHELL
> /bin/bash
>
> I try did that:
> 08:37:01 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$
> ./install-intellij-libs.sh 13.1.5 ~/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
> Installing IntelliJ artifacts to Maven local repository
> IntelliJ home: /home/soro/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
> ./install-intellij-libs.sh: 26: ./install-intellij-libs.sh: Syntax error:
> "(" unexpected (expecting "done")
>
> But that mode, work well:
> 08:50:47 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$ bash
> install-intellij-libs.sh 13.1.5 ~/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
>
> Some idea about it?
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141027/911a6634/attachment.html 

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Tue Oct 28 00:18:23 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:18:23 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] IntelliJ plugin build
In-Reply-To: <CAHLHu45F6UfS2n2On5tvjPMDdJWA0r5T4S7v0LJ6WjwBZtDFeg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHLHu44AOePGvmkjBkgjS2vg08hY245kF5GbyuCfReaayJbhTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu45F6UfS2n2On5tvjPMDdJWA0r5T4S7v0LJ6WjwBZtDFeg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4F3fKeTwGt8MEzFcVXK04+_=UAYU0e5ACfyNm0rK-cmPQ@mail.gmail.com>

Try getting rid of the special characters in your file paths? Not really
sure what could be wrong here. Also looks like you may be using a newer (or
different) version of IntelliJ than what the plugin calls for? (I think it
wants 13.1.4.) Though, that shouldn't really matter.

~Lincoln

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> wrote:

> Results :
> Failed tests:
>   ForgeServiceTest.testCommandLoading:51 null
>
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hiho Folks,
>>
>> I try create intellij dependency, but I had a problem:
>>
>> My shell:
>> 08:36:57 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$ echo $SHELL
>> /bin/bash
>>
>> I try did that:
>> 08:37:01 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$
>> ./install-intellij-libs.sh 13.1.5 ~/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
>> Installing IntelliJ artifacts to Maven local repository
>> IntelliJ home: /home/soro/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
>> ./install-intellij-libs.sh: 26: ./install-intellij-libs.sh: Syntax error:
>> "(" unexpected (expecting "done")
>>
>> But that mode, work well:
>> 08:50:47 (master) ~/Tools/workspace/intellij-idea-plugin$ bash
>> install-intellij-libs.sh 13.1.5 ~/Tools/idea-IU-135.1230/
>>
>> Some idea about it?
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141028/1546d8aa/attachment.html 

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Wed Oct 29 11:52:55 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:52:55 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge Meeting Minutes - 2014-10-29
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4Fzt0v4c55mAy08sjX3_HFry9zqx4Pcr1MgBZRWyogM3w@mail.gmail.com>

Minutes:
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/forge/2014/forge.2014-10-29-15.10.html

Minutes (text):
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/forge/2014/forge.2014-10-29-15.10.txt

Log:
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/forge/2014/forge.2014-10-29-15.10.log.html


Meeting summary
---------------
* Agenda  (lincolnthree, 15:10:47)

* Status reports  (lincolnthree, 15:13:58)
  * Last week I worked on some evangelization, and trying to work with
    the Netbeans guys and a few other teams to get forge promoted into
    some other technologies  (lincolnthree, 15:14:31)
  * Gave a talk on CDI using Forge last week in a JUG... doing the same
    next week in another JUG  (agoncal, 15:17:53)
  * gastaldi is working in the Forge 2 NetBeans plugin  (gastaldi,
    15:18:12)
  * Working on the Hands on Lab for Devoxx BE  (agoncal, 15:18:55)

* HoL Devoxx BE  (lincolnthree, 15:19:51)

* Refactoring UI Commands  (lincolnthree, 15:28:26)

-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141029/1bc31ae4/attachment.html 

From antonio.mailing at gmail.com  Wed Oct 29 13:02:36 2014
From: antonio.mailing at gmail.com (Antonio Goncalves)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:02:36 +0100
Subject: [forge-dev] Getting lost in UICommands class hierarchy
In-Reply-To: <544E41F9.1050809@redhat.com>
References: <CAKawoOY5Hf8MgHfE5EKiK4neRuFmNU+s9Sx_32k6QFWvPUUfAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<544E3BF5.1030304@redhat.com>
	<CAKawoObvYJdJH-W+ax7h64-mo48iaX9jX3AKR1Nd1KhFSckxTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<544E3DD9.1070604@redhat.com>
	<CAKawoOZhWd5CQ=dbFCKqtEyMOExQ_H0v3O-H9O=0gYNZt5o14g@mail.gmail.com>
	<544E41F9.1050809@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAKawoObZOPdrcaJkc2Gao0+Y4Z4pANenU3WirvoLQHvK6-nuEg@mail.gmail.com>

Everybody is welcome to contribute to the JIRA :
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2109

Antonio

2014-10-27 14:00 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:

>  Agreed. Let's discuss about this in the next meeting.
>
>
> On 10/27/2014 10:49 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
> This refactoring is quite important, we should talk about this during the
> next meeting. I would be more than happy to try to do it, but I fear to
> break any tests or backward compatibility issue...
>
> 2014-10-27 13:43 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:
>
>>  Great, so +1 to that.
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/2014 10:41 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>>
>> The extra layer of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand,
>> AbstractJPACommand (notice that this layer already exists for JSF) is
>> justified by overriding isProjectRequired and getPrerequisiteCommands (all
>> the Java EE commands need a project and need to be setup, see the code
>> below).
>>
>>  Then, if you say that the interface is optional, I would get rid of it.
>>
>>  All in all, I think that homogenize the code is very important for new
>> comers (like me). Creating a new command is, mostly, copy/paste + adding
>> some specific logic. And depending which class you copy/paste, you end up
>> with very different code.
>>
>>  Antonio
>>
>>
>>  @Override
>> *protected boolean *isProjectRequired()
>> {
>>    *return true*;
>> }
>>     @Override
>>    public NavigationResult getPrerequisiteCommands(UIContext context)
>>    {
>>       NavigationResultBuilder builder = NavigationResultBuilder.create();
>>       Project project = getSelectedProject(context);
>>       if (project != null)
>>       {
>>          if (!project.hasFacet(CDIFacet.class))
>>          {
>>             builder.add(CDISetupCommand.class);
>>          }
>>       }
>>       return builder.build();
>>    }
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-27 13:35 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:
>>
>>>  Hi Antonio,
>>>
>>> Yeah, I think that's fine. The idea of having an interface is to
>>> reference the next command in the next() method (or as a prerequisite), but
>>> that is optional.
>>> I think that would be a good idea, if these specializations had enough
>>> code to justify their existence.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/27/2014 02:58 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>>>
>>>   Hi all,
>>>
>>>  I'm trying to add more commands in Forge... but I have to say, I'm a
>>> bit lost. So, I've made a quick UML class diagram.
>>>
>>>  As you can see in the attached diagram (UIForge.png), most of the Java
>>> EE commands extend AbstractJavaEECommand, which makes sense. But not all of
>>> them (NewBeanCommand (CDI), ValidationNewAnnotationCommandImpl,
>>> NewQualifierCommand....). And some times you have an extra level of
>>> abstraction (AbstractFacesCommand). Same for the Java commands.
>>> JavaClassCommandImpl extend AbstractJavaSourceCommand but
>>> JavaAddAnnotationCommand and JavaFieldCommand inherit from
>>> AbstractProjectCommand.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Then, when you dive into a command (UIForgeStructure.pgn), some
>>> commands use interface and implementation (see in the second
>>> diagram JavaAddAnnotationCommandImpl
>>> implementing JavaAddAnnotationCommand), some don't
>>> (e.g. NewQualifierCommand). Is there a reason ?
>>>
>>>
>>>  Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it would be (HowIseeIt.png)
>>> : under AbstractJavaEECommand you have a set
>>> of AbstractValidationCommand, AbstractCDICommand, AbstractJPACommand....
>>> each implementing PrerequisiteCommandsProvider (this way, each command sets
>>> up its own pre-requisite). And then, under AbstractCDICommand you have all
>>> the NewQualifierCommand, NewBeanCommand....
>>>
>>>
>>>  What do you think ? Am I the only one getting a little bit lost ;o)
>>>
>>>  What do you think of re-structuring the class hierarchy ?
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Antonio Goncalves
>>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>>
>>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>>> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>>> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
 | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France
<http://www.devoxx.fr/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141029/74c33fe7/attachment-0001.html 

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Wed Oct 29 16:28:44 2014
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:28:44 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] How to have multiple choices in a Forge command ?
In-Reply-To: <64188F7C-7D14-4A65-9384-8C86E43E59C0@redhat.com>
References: <CAKawoOaePpjGfsAOTiq4+zzCK5oJOOJX_oTvSk-1vudk=ewEWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKawoOaP-Me-zcMn3GwJXuutFt1Kn=Wz7z3nMPVs54V-dBDSng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu477N3Fp7XZG_=hYn0otenxu_wPL_029fQaf4rsUojfNWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<64188F7C-7D14-4A65-9384-8C86E43E59C0@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4FSffB73r=5uiZoApXVPCMfrzTSkcB0NuuU9Z0JHmmBJQ@mail.gmail.com>

As George said, UISelectMany (or UIInputMany, depending on if you know the
possible values up front, or if the values are "open ended) serve to meet
both of your use cases. There are examples of this in the
AddonRemoveCommand.

https://github.com/forge/core/blob/master/addon-manager/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/forge/addon/manager/impl/ui/AddonRemoveCommand.java#L41

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:07 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi Antonio,
>
> As Daniel said, you need to use UISelectMany (eg:
> https://github.com/rafabene/addon-deltaspike/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/forge/addon/deltaspike/commands/AbstractDeltaSpikeCommand.java).
> See the UI addon documentation about the possible UI types:
> http://forge.jboss.org/addon/org.jboss.forge.addon:ui
>
>
>
> Em 26/10/2014, ?s 10:06, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> Hiho Antonio,
>
> jpa-new-listener --named MyListener --lifecycle PRE_PERSIST, POST_UPDATE, POST_REMOVE
>
> Maybe, DeltaSpike Addon can help you.
> It?s simple and easy to understand.
>
> In DeltaSpike Addon you can do that:
>
> deltaspike-install-modules[1] --modules JPA JSF Servlet Data
>
> For this case:
>
> jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener
>
> I don?t have a sample for it or I don?t remeber now.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/rafabene/addon-deltaspike/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/forge/addon/deltaspike/commands/DeltaSpikeInstallModulesCommand.java
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Antonio Goncalves <
> antonio.mailing at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And I have the same need for "Being able to create a new JPA listener" (
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2093) :
>>
>> jpa-new-listener --named MyListener --lifecycle PRE_PERSIST, POST_UPDATE, POST_REMOVE
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-26 12:23 GMT+01:00 Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I want to work on "Being able to add a listener when creating a new JPA
>>> entity "(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2094). Basically, when I
>>> create a new JPA entity, I want to be able to add as many listeners as I
>>> want.
>>>
>>> jpa-new-entity --named  MyEntity --listener DebugListener, AuditListener
>>>
>>> Would generate :
>>>
>>> @Entity
>>> @EntityListeners({ DebugListener.class, AuditListener })
>>>
>>> public class MyEntity
>>> {
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> How do I do to be able to have several choices on an attribute ? I only
>>> know how to manage one value but not several one. Is it doable ? Any
>>> exemple in any Forge command ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> --
>>> Antonio Goncalves
>>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>>
>>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>>> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>>> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
>> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
> ?
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20141029/4e175219/attachment.html