From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Oct  6 11:12:33 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:12:33 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge meeting minutes - 06-10-2015
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJjkJD-CsKK_m1E_Lz1JcDiRpQ+2LN4DJQVidnt4so6tsQ@mail.gmail.com>

==============
#forge Meeting
==============


Meeting started by gastaldi at 14:02:14 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/forge/2015/forge.2015-10-06-14.02.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Agenda  (gastaldi, 14:02:54)

* Status Report  (gastaldi, 14:05:49)
  * I am working on fixing bugs for the next release. Mainly some test
    failures introduced with the latest Aesh version.  (gastaldi,
    14:08:20)
  * Also due to a change in the UISelectOne behavior that no longer
    accepts any value, just the ones present in value choices
    (gastaldi, 14:10:50)
  * mkouba also offered some help on improving the CDI integration
    performance. Right now my work in the performance issue made Forge
    startup in ~5s, which I believe is an acceptable boot time
    (gastaldi, 14:13:38)
  * I have reduced the number of core addons using CDI to 4. This lead
    to less memory usage. I have also enabled Jandex and upgraded to the
    latest Weld version for the CDI container.  (gastaldi, 14:17:29)

* Roadmap  (gastaldi, 14:23:30)
  * I have put together some goals that I'd like to achieve for the next
    Forge releases in a document that is shared with some people
    (gastaldi, 14:25:26)
  * LINK:
    https://docs.google.com/a/redhat.com/document/d/1giz9Rfzd-auEgWqspe63CSgA5umLnWWuSDheJxWBCpo/edit?usp=docslist_api
    (gastaldi, 14:26:06)
  * I had a meeting with my manager rruss last friday and we added some
    action items on each goal that we intend to have them done by this
    week or next  (gastaldi, 14:27:53)

* Blocking for next release  (gastaldi, 14:56:19)
  * There are no blocking issues for the next release  (gastaldi,
    15:01:54)

Meeting ended at 15:06:38 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* gastaldi (56)
* agoncal (36)
* jbott (7)
* koentsje (5)
* jbossbot (2)
* agoncal_ (1)
* vineetreynolds (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151006/976181c7/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Wed Oct  7 01:23:09 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 02:23:09 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Forge users,

For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum requirement.

The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement for
their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with sources
set to 1.7 still)

Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because the
Forge train never stops ;)

Best Regards, love you all!

George Gastaldi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/40a629a6/attachment.html 

From danielsoro at gmail.com  Wed Oct  7 01:43:22 2015
From: danielsoro at gmail.com (Daniel Cunha)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 02:43:22 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>

I agree with that! :)

+1 for Java 8.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello Forge users,
>
> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum requirement.
>
> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement for
> their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with sources
> set to 1.7 still)
>
> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because the
> Forge train never stops ;)
>
> Best Regards, love you all!
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro)
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
http://www.tomitribe.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/205ec187/attachment.html 

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Wed Oct  7 02:40:17 2015
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:40:17 +0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geroge,

That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner classes
with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)

Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:

<plugin>
   <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
   <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
   <configuration>
      <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
   </configuration>
</plugin>

It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when I
try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).

Cheers,
Ivan


On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with that! :)
>
> +1 for Java 8.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Forge users,
>>
>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum requirement.
>>
>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement for
>> their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with sources
>> set to 1.7 still)
>>
>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because
>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>
>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>
>> George Gastaldi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro)
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/fdaa68ed/attachment.html 

From danielsoro at gmail.com  Wed Oct  7 03:10:11 2015
From: danielsoro at gmail.com (Daniel Cunha)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 04:10:11 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>

Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a final
version of Java 9 ATM)

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Geroge,
>
> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner classes
> with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)
>
> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
>
> <plugin>
>    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>    <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
>    <configuration>
>       <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
>    </configuration>
> </plugin>
>
> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when I
> try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree with that! :)
>>
>> +1 for Java 8.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Forge users,
>>>
>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>>> requirement.
>>>
>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement
>>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with
>>> sources set to 1.7 still)
>>>
>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because
>>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>>
>>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>>
>>> George Gastaldi
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro)
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
http://www.tomitribe.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/9e278c75/attachment-0001.html 

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Wed Oct  7 03:36:23 2015
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:36:23 +0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACYLA9FvEDNtR6v_29+ncV8yt83P72ni7miaNNaVT5aw3MyfZQ@mail.gmail.com>

The problem with Java 9 is that you can't run tests, because the JVM that
runs them won't start. If you want to run with Java 9, you have to either
run the build with -DskipTests or remove this from pom.xml.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> wrote:

> Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
> Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a final
> version of Java 9 ATM)
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Geroge,
>>
>> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner
>> classes with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)
>>
>> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
>>
>> <plugin>
>>    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>    <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
>>    <configuration>
>>       <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
>>    </configuration>
>> </plugin>
>>
>> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when
>> I try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with that! :)
>>>
>>> +1 for Java 8.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Forge users,
>>>>
>>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>>>> requirement.
>>>>
>>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement
>>>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with
>>>> sources set to 1.7 still)
>>>>
>>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because
>>>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>>>
>>>> George Gastaldi
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro)
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/ef6ae759/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Wed Oct  7 06:05:37 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 07:05:37 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9FvEDNtR6v_29+ncV8yt83P72ni7miaNNaVT5aw3MyfZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FvEDNtR6v_29+ncV8yt83P72ni7miaNNaVT5aw3MyfZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJjiRJKR6wqpuxkaMX13h-3M6uZot+zAg5MdHcE_eN1pQg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ivan, thanks for the feedback.

Yeah, I was thinking of removing that or move it to a maven profile that is
activated when the project builds on JDK7 only (that can be done now).

So far the only objection I have received about moving to JDK8 is from the
Fabric8 team asking that this should be done in Forge 3:
https://twitter.com/davsclaus/status/651632079566950400?s=09

Best Regards,
Em 07/10/2015 04:36, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:

> The problem with Java 9 is that you can't run tests, because the JVM that
> runs them won't start. If you want to run with Java 9, you have to either
> run the build with -DskipTests or remove this from pom.xml.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
>> Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a
>> final version of Java 9 ATM)
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Geroge,
>>>
>>> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner
>>> classes with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)
>>>
>>> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
>>>
>>> <plugin>
>>>    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>    <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
>>>    <configuration>
>>>       <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
>>>    </configuration>
>>> </plugin>
>>>
>>> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when
>>> I try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with that! :)
>>>>
>>>> +1 for Java 8.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Forge users,
>>>>>
>>>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>>>>> requirement.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement
>>>>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with
>>>>> sources set to 1.7 still)
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because
>>>>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>>>>
>>>>> George Gastaldi
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/8a56d1ea/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Wed Oct  7 13:00:42 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:00:42 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJjiRJKR6wqpuxkaMX13h-3M6uZot+zAg5MdHcE_eN1pQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FvEDNtR6v_29+ncV8yt83P72ni7miaNNaVT5aw3MyfZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJjiRJKR6wqpuxkaMX13h-3M6uZot+zAg5MdHcE_eN1pQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJi3Xh7qSZLGjrvgFgipD+EbAzZQ3NRB_ZDvjbCp0knj9g@mail.gmail.com>

I created a poll to gather feedback and help in our decision to upgrade the
minimum JDK version to 8:  http://goo.gl/forms/yqGss6gxOA

I appreciate if you could help us by answering just those 2 questions, it
should take some seconds.

Thank you!

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:05 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Ivan, thanks for the feedback.
>
> Yeah, I was thinking of removing that or move it to a maven profile that
> is activated when the project builds on JDK7 only (that can be done now).
>
> So far the only objection I have received about moving to JDK8 is from the
> Fabric8 team asking that this should be done in Forge 3:
> https://twitter.com/davsclaus/status/651632079566950400?s=09
>
> Best Regards,
> Em 07/10/2015 04:36, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> The problem with Java 9 is that you can't run tests, because the JVM that
>> runs them won't start. If you want to run with Java 9, you have to either
>> run the build with -DskipTests or remove this from pom.xml.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
>>> Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a
>>> final version of Java 9 ATM)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <
>>> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Geroge,
>>>>
>>>> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner
>>>> classes with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)
>>>>
>>>> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
>>>>
>>>> <plugin>
>>>>    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>>    <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
>>>>    <configuration>
>>>>       <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
>>>>    </configuration>
>>>> </plugin>
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time
>>>> when I try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ivan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree with that! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Java 8.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Forge users,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>>>>>> requirement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement
>>>>>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with
>>>>>> sources set to 1.7 still)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace,
>>>>>> because the Forge train never stops ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> George Gastaldi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>


-- 
*George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer*

JBoss Forge Team
T: +55 11 3524-6169
M: +55 47 9711-1000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/b338ead3/attachment-0001.html 

From danielsoro at gmail.com  Wed Oct  7 13:04:31 2015
From: danielsoro at gmail.com (Daniel Cunha)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:04:31 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJi3Xh7qSZLGjrvgFgipD+EbAzZQ3NRB_ZDvjbCp0knj9g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FvEDNtR6v_29+ncV8yt83P72ni7miaNNaVT5aw3MyfZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJjiRJKR6wqpuxkaMX13h-3M6uZot+zAg5MdHcE_eN1pQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJi3Xh7qSZLGjrvgFgipD+EbAzZQ3NRB_ZDvjbCp0knj9g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHLHu47NrZ4TKSq4SQX97giE9nZhhuGOQ=xZ7v6KJX6a36ym7A@mail.gmail.com>

+1

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:00 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:

> I created a poll to gather feedback and help in our decision to upgrade
> the minimum JDK version to 8:  http://goo.gl/forms/yqGss6gxOA
>
> I appreciate if you could help us by answering just those 2 questions, it
> should take some seconds.
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:05 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ivan, thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> Yeah, I was thinking of removing that or move it to a maven profile that
>> is activated when the project builds on JDK7 only (that can be done now).
>>
>> So far the only objection I have received about moving to JDK8 is from
>> the Fabric8 team asking that this should be done in Forge 3:
>> https://twitter.com/davsclaus/status/651632079566950400?s=09
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Em 07/10/2015 04:36, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> The problem with Java 9 is that you can't run tests, because the JVM
>>> that runs them won't start. If you want to run with Java 9, you have to
>>> either run the build with -DskipTests or remove this from pom.xml.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
>>>> Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a
>>>> final version of Java 9 ATM)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <
>>>> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Geroge,
>>>>>
>>>>> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner
>>>>> classes with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
>>>>>
>>>>> <plugin>
>>>>>    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>>>    <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
>>>>>    <configuration>
>>>>>       <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
>>>>>    </configuration>
>>>>> </plugin>
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time
>>>>> when I try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with that! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for Java 8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Forge users,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>>>>>>> requirement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum
>>>>>>> requirement for their new versions. We are already running our build in
>>>>>>> JDK8 (with sources set to 1.7 still)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace,
>>>>>>> because the Forge train never stops ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> George Gastaldi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer*
>
> JBoss Forge Team
> T: +55 11 3524-6169
> M: +55 47 9711-1000
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro)
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
http://www.tomitribe.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/72448d47/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Thu Oct  8 01:27:49 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 02:27:49 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJj8EcYfMMbJOYfO6ZbFD-_ZMLUcHPYk6yHCMQaYqscp3Q@mail.gmail.com>

Just removed this parameter. Our builds are running in JDK 8 already but
with source/target 1.7 and MaxPermSize is deprecated.

Thanks for the heads up.
Em 07/10/2015 03:40, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Geroge,
>
> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner classes
> with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)
>
> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
>
> <plugin>
>    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>    <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
>    <configuration>
>       <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
>    </configuration>
> </plugin>
>
> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when I
> try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree with that! :)
>>
>> +1 for Java 8.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Forge users,
>>>
>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>>> requirement.
>>>
>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement
>>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with
>>> sources set to 1.7 still)
>>>
>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because
>>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>>
>>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>>
>>> George Gastaldi
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151008/36484b04/attachment-0001.html 

From manderse at redhat.com  Thu Oct  8 11:53:44 2015
From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen)
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:53:44 +0200
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJjiRJKR6wqpuxkaMX13h-3M6uZot+zAg5MdHcE_eN1pQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FvEDNtR6v_29+ncV8yt83P72ni7miaNNaVT5aw3MyfZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJjiRJKR6wqpuxkaMX13h-3M6uZot+zAg5MdHcE_eN1pQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <B0C33CD2-141A-4AAC-A466-C1B9425C4BD9@redhat.com>

On 7 Oct 2015, at 12:05, George Gastaldi wrote:

> Hi Ivan, thanks for the feedback.
>
> Yeah, I was thinking of removing that or move it to a maven profile 
> that is
> activated when the project builds on JDK7 only (that can be done now).
>
> So far the only objection I have received about moving to JDK8 is from 
> the
> Fabric8 team asking that this should be done in Forge 3:
> https://twitter.com/davsclaus/status/651632079566950400?s=09

His point is very valid.

But wonder what data he has ;)

btw. it is only jboss tools master (i.e. for Neon) that is currently 
freely opened for Java 8.

/max

> Best Regards,
> Em 07/10/2015 04:36, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> 
> escreveu:
>
>> The problem with Java 9 is that you can't run tests, because the JVM 
>> that
>> runs them won't start. If you want to run with Java 9, you have to 
>> either
>> run the build with -DskipTests or remove this from pom.xml.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
>>> Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a
>>> final version of Java 9 ATM)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov 
>>> <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Geroge,
>>>>
>>>> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner
>>>> classes with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in 
>>>> the APIs :)
>>>>
>>>> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
>>>>
>>>> <plugin>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
>>>> <configuration>
>>>> <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
>>>> </configuration>
>>>> </plugin>
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time 
>>>> when
>>>> I try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ivan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree with that! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Java 8.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi 
>>>>> <ggastald at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Forge users,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
>>>>>> requirement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum 
>>>>>> requirement
>>>>>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 
>>>>>> (with
>>>>>> sources set to 1.7 still)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, 
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> George Gastaldi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen

From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Oct 13 11:19:02 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:19:02 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge meeting minutes - 13-10-2015
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJh4s=-s8ZURomZ=a2wKKjSoem0yySnEWpsKmmte17m7_g@mail.gmail.com>

==============
#forge Meeting
==============


Meeting started by gastaldi at 14:13:22 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/forge/2015/forge.2015-10-13-14.13.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Agenda  (gastaldi, 14:13:54)

* Status Report  (gastaldi, 14:16:18)
  * Last week I have been fixing some bugs and making sure that the CI
    server is running smoothly.  (gastaldi, 14:16:59)
  * I have also added some new features to the UI API, like, making it
    API independent of CDI itself  (gastaldi, 14:18:36)
  * Weld is no longer in the Yourkit hotspot list. Enabling Jandex did
    the trick. This feature will be available in the next release
    (gastaldi, 14:21:23)

* JDK 8 Poll Results  (gastaldi, 14:22:50)
  * Last week I started a Poll about migrating Forge to JDK 8. These are
    the results:
    https://docs.google.com/a/redhat.com/forms/d/1TsXBp6VFHQkSQtER18OyEaGncb5TRY7AkIxHE5R3DFE/viewanalytics
    (gastaldi, 14:24:04)
  * Almost 70% are using JDK 8 and a bit more than 60% are fine in
    having Forge upgraded to JDK 8 in a minor release  (gastaldi,
    14:25:03)
  * The Forge team will release 2.20.0.Final still JDK 7 compatible.
    This will be the last 2.x release with new features. Next release
    will be Forge 3.0.0.Final (which will be master).  (gastaldi,
    14:30:20)
  * I have introduced a deprecation mechanism in commands, that would
    ease adoption on a new command naming convention  (gastaldi,
    14:34:07)
  * LINK: https://github.com/forge/roaster/pull/27   (gastaldi,
    14:42:45)
  * UPDATE: The Forge team will create a 3.x branch and release Forge 3
    only when a decent list of features are available. Development of
    2.x will continue on master branch  (gastaldi, 14:52:08)

* Priorities  (gastaldi, 15:00:08)
  * Weekly tasks will be focused on preparing the 3.x branch and
    implementing some features for a 3.0.0.Alpha1 release targetting
    November  (gastaldi, 15:13:42)

Meeting ended at 15:16:25 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* gastaldi (64)
* agoncal (29)
* jbossbot (6)
* jbott (6)
* vineetreynolds (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151013/f64c8f61/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Oct 13 13:18:52 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:18:52 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] JDK 8
In-Reply-To: <B0C33CD2-141A-4AAC-A466-C1B9425C4BD9@redhat.com>
References: <CAMmsnJjTsPCuXKe9spwLb2u7dpbgQTYyqpVuTqgJB7004+KAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu47WNWwqgqL==xqvm0rbL2yjuLYsYXPeGxPcV7067=pJag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9EkkDz2kSs962M1rL2J8NpAjA3mJ2Hdz6_sC6FoJCbDWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHLHu457fGRWVYegc-4U8tq3O+J5TL97h985fczBcajedvR4pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FvEDNtR6v_29+ncV8yt83P72ni7miaNNaVT5aw3MyfZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJjiRJKR6wqpuxkaMX13h-3M6uZot+zAg5MdHcE_eN1pQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<B0C33CD2-141A-4AAC-A466-C1B9425C4BD9@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJitYD0-aV85J23x-bNv6msFh4FpFLJPHo7ty4RnfnnqeA@mail.gmail.com>

Poll is over. We decided to have JDK 8 supported in Forge 3. I have already
started some work in https://github.com/forge/core/tree/3.x and should
release an Alpha version still this year.
We'll keep using JDK 7 for the 2.x branch. New Features will be introduced
in Forge 3.

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 7 Oct 2015, at 12:05, George Gastaldi wrote:
>
> > Hi Ivan, thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > Yeah, I was thinking of removing that or move it to a maven profile
> > that is
> > activated when the project builds on JDK7 only (that can be done now).
> >
> > So far the only objection I have received about moving to JDK8 is from
> > the
> > Fabric8 team asking that this should be done in Forge 3:
> > https://twitter.com/davsclaus/status/651632079566950400?s=09
>
> His point is very valid.
>
> But wonder what data he has ;)
>
> btw. it is only jboss tools master (i.e. for Neon) that is currently
> freely opened for Java 8.
>
> /max
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Em 07/10/2015 04:36, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >
> >> The problem with Java 9 is that you can't run tests, because the JVM
> >> that
> >> runs them won't start. If you want to run with Java 9, you have to
> >> either
> >> run the build with -DskipTests or remove this from pom.xml.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Make sense remove it from the pom if we go to Java 8. :)
> >>> Can you share your problem with Java 9? (even though we don't have a
> >>> final version of Java 9 ATM)
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov
> >>> <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Geroge,
> >>>>
> >>>> That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner
> >>>> classes with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in
> >>>> the APIs :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:
> >>>>
> >>>> <plugin>
> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> >>>> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
> >>>> <configuration>
> >>>> <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
> >>>> </configuration>
> >>>> </plugin>
> >>>>
> >>>> It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time
> >>>> when
> >>>> I try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Ivan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I agree with that! :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 for Java 8.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi
> >>>>> <ggastald at redhat.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello Forge users,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum
> >>>>>> requirement.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum
> >>>>>> requirement
> >>>>>> for their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8
> >>>>>> (with
> >>>>>> sources set to 1.7 still)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace,
> >>>>>> because
> >>>>>> the Forge train never stops ;)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best Regards, love you all!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> George Gastaldi
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> forge-dev mailing list
> >>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
> >>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> forge-dev mailing list
> >>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> forge-dev mailing list
> >>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Daniel Cunha (soro)
> >>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> forge-dev mailing list
> >>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> forge-dev mailing list
> >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
*George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer*

JBoss Forge Team
T: +55 11 3524-6169
M: +55 47 9711-1000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151013/e330eb4e/attachment-0001.html 

From rmpestano at gmail.com  Sun Oct 18 19:33:08 2015
From: rmpestano at gmail.com (Rafael Pestano)
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:33:08 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] Cant set Json array as FileResource content
Message-ID: <CADjFuPr_Cx5_aPe9nAWEGRnS=GMsE3QUFupRb_J0bLKzgEEu-Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi guys,

I'm trying to set the contents of a FileResource with an unNamed array,
example:

FileResource<?> fileResource =
root.getChild("test").reify(FileResource.class);


fileResource.setContents("[]"); //same as
Json.createArrayBuilder().build().toString()

here it throws the exception:

org.jboss.forge.addon.resource.ResourceException: Error while setting the
Json contents
    at
org.jboss.forge.addon.parser.json.resource.JsonResourceImpl.setContents(JsonResourceImpl.java:98)
    at
org.jboss.forge.addon.parser.json.resource.JsonResourceImpl.setContents(JsonResourceImpl.java:29)


I think the error is because JsonResource tries to read an object (instead
of an array in the case) in set contents(JsonResourceImpl line 93):

setContents(reader.readObject());



is this a bug or intended behaviour?

-- 
<http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,

Rafael M. Pestano

Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
@realpestano <https://twitter.com/realpestano>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151018/b9e1c71e/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Sun Oct 18 22:06:38 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:06:38 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] Cant set Json array as FileResource content
In-Reply-To: <CADjFuPr_Cx5_aPe9nAWEGRnS=GMsE3QUFupRb_J0bLKzgEEu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADjFuPr_Cx5_aPe9nAWEGRnS=GMsE3QUFupRb_J0bLKzgEEu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJioCYXzNtEO-RPZ8L6Wx5-hWeE_WLGBRzqqV5aLv8Pcmg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rafael,

This is definitely a bug. I created a JIRA and pushed the fix (along with a
reproducible test case): https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2500

Thanks for catching this :)

Best Regards,

George Gastaldi

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to set the contents of a FileResource with an unNamed array,
> example:
>
> FileResource<?> fileResource =
> root.getChild("test").reify(FileResource.class);
>
>
> fileResource.setContents("[]"); //same as
> Json.createArrayBuilder().build().toString()
>
> here it throws the exception:
>
> org.jboss.forge.addon.resource.ResourceException: Error while setting the
> Json contents
>     at
> org.jboss.forge.addon.parser.json.resource.JsonResourceImpl.setContents(JsonResourceImpl.java:98)
>     at
> org.jboss.forge.addon.parser.json.resource.JsonResourceImpl.setContents(JsonResourceImpl.java:29)
>
>
> I think the error is because JsonResource tries to read an object (instead
> of an array in the case) in set contents(JsonResourceImpl line 93):
>
> setContents(reader.readObject());
>
>
>
> is this a bug or intended behaviour?
>
> --
> <http://www.advancedit.com.br/>Att,
>
> Rafael M. Pestano
>
> Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
> http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
> @realpestano <https://twitter.com/realpestano>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
*George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer*

JBoss Forge Team
T: +55 11 3524-6169
M: +55 47 9711-1000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151019/7fc70240/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Oct 20 10:37:46 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:37:46 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge meeting minutes - 10/20/2015
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJg0ps-e6qMCMsUHh_NJqE5matddMkuOW_MNi4R2cMHGVg@mail.gmail.com>

#forge Meeting
Meeting started by gastaldi at 14:09:27 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    Agenda (gastaldi, 14:09:39)
    Status report (gastaldi, 14:14:30)
        I released Forge 2.20.0.Final last week and started work on Forge 3
(gastaldi, 14:15:17)
        I created an addon to allow creation of NodeJS projects:
https://github.com/forge/nodejs-addon (gastaldi, 14:17:06)
        (gastaldi, 14:17:28)
        I forked the JBoss AS addon to the Forge organization (gastaldi,
14:19:07)

    Priorities (gastaldi, 14:32:24)
        i am working on Forge 3 to get an Alpha1 asap (gastaldi, 14:32:55)
        I am working on getting a better NodeJS addon. Pull requests are
welcome :) (gastaldi, 14:34:28)

Meeting ended at 14:35:06 UTC (full logs).

Action items

    (none)

People present (lines said)

    gastaldi (14)
    jbott (5)
    jbossbot (1)
    koentsje (0)

Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151020/85aa8619/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Oct 27 11:38:37 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:38:37 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] Forge meeting minutes - 2015-10-27
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJiTkcTzzQGbpa33B+=SGbc8A1t8MqkAPvujejq6nusw=w@mail.gmail.com>

==============
#forge Meeting
==============


Meeting started by gastaldi at 14:30:33 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/forge/2015/forge.2015-10-27-14.30.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Agenda  (gastaldi, 14:30:45)

* Current Status  (gastaldi, 14:33:53)
  * Working with Antoine on our University (Devoxx BE + MA) about CDI
    using Forge (extensivelly)  (agoncal, 14:35:53)
  * Last week we had a meeting about the alignment of Forge with the Red
    Hat Developer Programs. Some tasks were decided and now I am working
    on making those happen.  (gastaldi, 14:36:00)
  * Worked on a NodeJS addon as a PoC that Forge can be used with other
    technologies:
    https://twitter.com/JBossForge/status/656202547783421953  (gastaldi,
    14:36:58)

* Priorities  (gastaldi, 14:46:58)

* Conference Feedback  (gastaldi, 14:50:57)

* Forge 3.0.0.Alpha1  (gastaldi, 15:21:17)
  * Forge 3.0.0.Alpha1 should contain a minor subset of the improvements
    we're planning for Forge 3  (gastaldi, 15:21:57)
  * We'll strucutre our thoughts this year about what would go into
    Forge 3 and schedule a Hangout meeting in January  (gastaldi,
    15:33:52)

Meeting ended at 15:35:15 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* gastaldi (66)
* agoncal (52)
* jbott (12)
* jbossbot (4)
* vineetreynolds (0)
* stalep (0)
* agoncal_ (0)
* koentsje (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot



-- 
*George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer*

JBoss Forge Team
T: +55 11 3524-6169
M: +55 47 9711-1000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151027/e908ee86/attachment.html 

From jer at printstacktrace.org  Tue Oct 27 22:21:30 2015
From: jer at printstacktrace.org (=?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbWll?=)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:21:30 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] as-addon and jboss-as-addon releases.
Message-ID: <CAGM=3htyROb5NiK_G4esnW2JYdeUe9jQG0C5u-Zf0rOGeJuySA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi folks,

I would like to release the as-addon and jboss-as-addon .

For that I would perform the following steps:

    1) Fock addons on https://github.com/forge  ( George thank you for
permissions)
    2) Release a RC1 version.
    3) Add more unit tests.
    4) Call for volunteers to test it.
    5) Fix issues.
    6) Release it.
    7) Update documentations like the "Hands-on Lab"
    8) Update the addons web catalog.

All comments or suggestions are welcome.

Regards,
Jeremie.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151027/623fc1b9/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Oct 27 22:33:52 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:33:52 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] as-addon and jboss-as-addon releases.
In-Reply-To: <CAGM=3htyROb5NiK_G4esnW2JYdeUe9jQG0C5u-Zf0rOGeJuySA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGM=3htyROb5NiK_G4esnW2JYdeUe9jQG0C5u-Zf0rOGeJuySA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJixHV41Ss8imDF_Md7EtDjwRL5c+KAJ-PMUEGVv0km6Dg@mail.gmail.com>

+1 ! Go for it :)

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:21 AM, J?r?mie <jer at printstacktrace.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to release the as-addon and jboss-as-addon .
>
> For that I would perform the following steps:
>
>     1) Fock addons on https://github.com/forge  ( George thank you for
> permissions)
>     2) Release a RC1 version.
>     3) Add more unit tests.
>     4) Call for volunteers to test it.
>     5) Fix issues.
>     6) Release it.
>     7) Update documentations like the "Hands-on Lab"
>     8) Update the addons web catalog.
>
> All comments or suggestions are welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Jeremie.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
*George Gastaldi*

https://about.me/gastaldi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151028/8abdc599/attachment-0001.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Oct 27 22:37:09 2015
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:37:09 -0200
Subject: [forge-dev] as-addon and jboss-as-addon releases.
In-Reply-To: <CAGM=3htyROb5NiK_G4esnW2JYdeUe9jQG0C5u-Zf0rOGeJuySA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGM=3htyROb5NiK_G4esnW2JYdeUe9jQG0C5u-Zf0rOGeJuySA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJjrPSEWeTNmckmSXh5zfFjbHQ=XY9TJkt+qkbMUXti6LQ@mail.gmail.com>

One question: Can we somehow reuse the Arquillian adapters to control the
servers? It would be nice to reuse that because it would save a lot of work
and also support plenty adapters OOTB.

Thoughts?

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:21 AM, J?r?mie <jer at printstacktrace.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to release the as-addon and jboss-as-addon .
>
> For that I would perform the following steps:
>
>     1) Fock addons on https://github.com/forge  ( George thank you for
> permissions)
>     2) Release a RC1 version.
>     3) Add more unit tests.
>     4) Call for volunteers to test it.
>     5) Fix issues.
>     6) Release it.
>     7) Update documentations like the "Hands-on Lab"
>     8) Update the addons web catalog.
>
> All comments or suggestions are welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Jeremie.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
*George Gastaldi*

https://about.me/gastaldi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151028/c387cf84/attachment.html