[forge-users] And what about have "utility" commands ?

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Sat Nov 8 11:38:30 EST 2014


Yeah, these commands should probably be in their relative command
categories:

jpa-new-entitymanager-producer
java-new-loggerproducer

or something like that

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:14 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:

> That sounds like a good idea. +1
>
> Em 08/11/2014, às 09:28, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In my projects I tend to repeat some utility code again and again. For
> example, produce the EntityManager so I can inject it, produce a Log4J
> logger so I can inject it, have an exception interceptor for my JSF
> beans.... and so on.
>
> What about having a set of utility commands that generate those sorts of
> classes ? Something like :
>
> util-new-entitymanager-producer
> util-new-logger-producer
> ....
>
> Not sure "util" is the right term.... just brainstorming here
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
> <http://www.parisjug.org/> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-users mailing list
> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-users mailing list
> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20141108/a8c1194e/attachment.html 


More information about the forge-users mailing list