From forge-users at lists.jboss.org  Wed Feb 15 19:27:28 2017
From: forge-users at lists.jboss.org (=?utf-8?B?55SE5ZCs5pm0?=)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:27:28 +0800
Subject: [forge-users] =?utf-8?b?Zm9yZ2UtdXNlcnM65LyB5Lia5aaC5L2V5aSE55CG?=
	=?utf-8?b?5ZGY5bel6L+d57qq6Zeu6aKYPyBucmtsM3c=?=
Message-ID: <20170216082735353038@jtmb.com>

forge-users:   ??
1.????????????????????????????
2.??????????????????
3.????????????????????????
4.??????????????????????????
5.??????????????
6.??????????????????????????
7.??????????????????????????
8.???????????????????
9.???????????????????????
???????????????????
????????????????
2017/2/16 ???8:27:31
                                                                                  ???
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170216/f36cfabb/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ??????????????????????.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 27224 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170216/f36cfabb/attachment-0001.bin 

From forge-users at lists.jboss.org  Mon Feb 20 11:47:21 2017
From: forge-users at lists.jboss.org (om)
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:47:21 -0000
Subject: [forge-users] =?utf-8?b?Zm9yZ2UtdXNlcnPvvJrouqvnu4/nmb7miJjnmoQ=?=
	=?utf-8?b?5aW55Li65LuA5LmI5Lya5aSx6LSl77yfIDAzMjM4?=
Message-ID: <20160222001128688463@nkxegesjd.com>

forge-users????
?????????????????????????
2016/2/22 ???0:11:27
???
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170220/359397d5/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ????2??????.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 19876 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170220/359397d5/attachment.bin 

From lburgazzoli at gmail.com  Fri Feb 24 04:07:11 2017
From: lburgazzoli at gmail.com (Luca Burgazzoli)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:07:11 +0100
Subject: [forge-users] [roaster] Format options not taken into account
Message-ID: <CAMpNYoafgefSGJmA8sQ8Qy55S9kyHmmPGYEQt8S0WrQKQw2pWw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

I'm doing some small experiments with Forge Roaster and I'm unable to
get some formatting options taken into account.

My code and the result is here:
https://gist.github.com/lburgazzoli/115377c3887972696f77db3a71fef85f

As you can notice, I configured some properties so that the code
should wrap at column 120 and it should use spaces instead of tabs but
my setup is ignored and the resulting code is still formatted with
some defaults.

Am I doing something wrong ?

Thx,
Luca

---
Luca Burgazzoli

From ggastald at redhat.com  Fri Feb 24 07:37:21 2017
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:37:21 -0300
Subject: [forge-users] [roaster] Format options not taken into account
In-Reply-To: <CAMpNYoafgefSGJmA8sQ8Qy55S9kyHmmPGYEQt8S0WrQKQw2pWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMpNYoafgefSGJmA8sQ8Qy55S9kyHmmPGYEQt8S0WrQKQw2pWw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJiR5SROywMeexJ1EHSNKfrvF=UnMqUH3TKFD2gjCeLWzw@mail.gmail.com>

Are you using the latest Roaster version (2.20.0.Final)?

Try using the constants without the shaded package value (eg.

Properties prefs = new Properties();
prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length", "25");

prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_lines_at_javadoc_boundaries",
"false");



Em 24 de fev de 2017 06:07, "Luca Burgazzoli" <lburgazzoli at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Hello,
>
> I'm doing some small experiments with Forge Roaster and I'm unable to
> get some formatting options taken into account.
>
> My code and the result is here:
> https://gist.github.com/lburgazzoli/115377c3887972696f77db3a71fef85f
>
> As you can notice, I configured some properties so that the code
> should wrap at column 120 and it should use spaces instead of tabs but
> my setup is ignored and the resulting code is still formatted with
> some defaults.
>
> Am I doing something wrong ?
>
> Thx,
> Luca
>
> ---
> Luca Burgazzoli
> _______________________________________________
> forge-users mailing list
> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170224/46303113/attachment.html 

From lburgazzoli at gmail.com  Fri Feb 24 07:55:02 2017
From: lburgazzoli at gmail.com (Luca Burgazzoli)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:55:02 +0100
Subject: [forge-users] [roaster] Format options not taken into account
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJiR5SROywMeexJ1EHSNKfrvF=UnMqUH3TKFD2gjCeLWzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMpNYoafgefSGJmA8sQ8Qy55S9kyHmmPGYEQt8S0WrQKQw2pWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJiR5SROywMeexJ1EHSNKfrvF=UnMqUH3TKFD2gjCeLWzw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMpNYobdkrmUhLxhar_Mw7oX0VJ0qT2O6B+vKL6bHbDBt4FQXA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi George,

yes I'm using the latest version:

  @Grab(group='org.jboss.forge.roaster', module='roaster-api',
version='2.20.0.Final')
  @Grab(group='org.jboss.forge.roaster', module='roaster-jdt',
version='2.20.0.Final')

I'm also using constants from DefaultCodeFormatterConstants, like:

    properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_LINE_SPLIT, "120")
    properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_CHAR, "space")
    properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_SIZE, "4")


---
Luca Burgazzoli


On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:37 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:
> Are you using the latest Roaster version (2.20.0.Final)?
>
> Try using the constants without the shaded package value (eg.
>
> Properties prefs = new Properties();
> prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length", "25");
>
> prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_lines_at_javadoc_boundaries",
> "false");
>
>
>
> Em 24 de fev de 2017 06:07, "Luca Burgazzoli" <lburgazzoli at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm doing some small experiments with Forge Roaster and I'm unable to
>> get some formatting options taken into account.
>>
>> My code and the result is here:
>> https://gist.github.com/lburgazzoli/115377c3887972696f77db3a71fef85f
>>
>> As you can notice, I configured some properties so that the code
>> should wrap at column 120 and it should use spaces instead of tabs but
>> my setup is ignored and the resulting code is still formatted with
>> some defaults.
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong ?
>>
>> Thx,
>> Luca
>>
>> ---
>> Luca Burgazzoli
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-users mailing list
>> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-users mailing list
> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users

From ggastald at redhat.com  Sun Feb 26 19:38:20 2017
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:38:20 -0300
Subject: [forge-users] [roaster] Format options not taken into account
In-Reply-To: <CAMpNYobdkrmUhLxhar_Mw7oX0VJ0qT2O6B+vKL6bHbDBt4FQXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMpNYoafgefSGJmA8sQ8Qy55S9kyHmmPGYEQt8S0WrQKQw2pWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJiR5SROywMeexJ1EHSNKfrvF=UnMqUH3TKFD2gjCeLWzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMpNYobdkrmUhLxhar_Mw7oX0VJ0qT2O6B+vKL6bHbDBt4FQXA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJh2+XdJHc_THqPxqmoa27ebbZREupuFUKk-rE65jFvKug@mail.gmail.com>

Right, see if it changes anything when using the constants without the
shaded package value:

  Properties prefs = new Properties();
  prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length", "25");
  prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_lines_at_javadoc_boundaries",
"false");

*George Gastaldi*

https://onename.com/gastaldi

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazzoli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi George,
>
> yes I'm using the latest version:
>
>   @Grab(group='org.jboss.forge.roaster', module='roaster-api',
> version='2.20.0.Final')
>   @Grab(group='org.jboss.forge.roaster', module='roaster-jdt',
> version='2.20.0.Final')
>
> I'm also using constants from DefaultCodeFormatterConstants, like:
>
>     properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_LINE_SPLIT,
> "120")
>     properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_CHAR,
> "space")
>     properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_SIZE, "4")
>
>
> ---
> Luca Burgazzoli
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:37 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Are you using the latest Roaster version (2.20.0.Final)?
> >
> > Try using the constants without the shaded package value (eg.
> >
> > Properties prefs = new Properties();
> > prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length", "25");
> >
> > prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_
> lines_at_javadoc_boundaries",
> > "false");
> >
> >
> >
> > Em 24 de fev de 2017 06:07, "Luca Burgazzoli" <lburgazzoli at gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm doing some small experiments with Forge Roaster and I'm unable to
> >> get some formatting options taken into account.
> >>
> >> My code and the result is here:
> >> https://gist.github.com/lburgazzoli/115377c3887972696f77db3a71fef85f
> >>
> >> As you can notice, I configured some properties so that the code
> >> should wrap at column 120 and it should use spaces instead of tabs but
> >> my setup is ignored and the resulting code is still formatted with
> >> some defaults.
> >>
> >> Am I doing something wrong ?
> >>
> >> Thx,
> >> Luca
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Luca Burgazzoli
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> forge-users mailing list
> >> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-users mailing list
> > forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
> _______________________________________________
> forge-users mailing list
> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170226/21ded204/attachment.html 

From lburgazzoli at gmail.com  Mon Feb 27 02:12:12 2017
From: lburgazzoli at gmail.com (Luca Burgazzoli)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:12:12 +0100
Subject: [forge-users] [roaster] Format options not taken into account
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJh2+XdJHc_THqPxqmoa27ebbZREupuFUKk-rE65jFvKug@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMpNYoafgefSGJmA8sQ8Qy55S9kyHmmPGYEQt8S0WrQKQw2pWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJiR5SROywMeexJ1EHSNKfrvF=UnMqUH3TKFD2gjCeLWzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMpNYobdkrmUhLxhar_Mw7oX0VJ0qT2O6B+vKL6bHbDBt4FQXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJh2+XdJHc_THqPxqmoa27ebbZREupuFUKk-rE65jFvKug@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMpNYoYL2Zbvre_eK3=B2s1CgRywFOsmJgmA6yHG0BQzjk_zMA@mail.gmail.com>

Same result

---
Luca Burgazzoli


On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:38 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:
> Right, see if it changes anything when using the constants without the
> shaded package value:
>
>   Properties prefs = new Properties();
>   prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length", "25");
>
> prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_lines_at_javadoc_boundaries",
> "false");
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> https://onename.com/gastaldi
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazzoli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi George,
>>
>> yes I'm using the latest version:
>>
>>   @Grab(group='org.jboss.forge.roaster', module='roaster-api',
>> version='2.20.0.Final')
>>   @Grab(group='org.jboss.forge.roaster', module='roaster-jdt',
>> version='2.20.0.Final')
>>
>> I'm also using constants from DefaultCodeFormatterConstants, like:
>>
>>     properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_LINE_SPLIT,
>> "120")
>>     properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_CHAR,
>> "space")
>>     properties.put(DefaultCodeFormatterConstants.FORMATTER_TAB_SIZE, "4")
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Luca Burgazzoli
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:37 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Are you using the latest Roaster version (2.20.0.Final)?
>> >
>> > Try using the constants without the shaded package value (eg.
>> >
>> > Properties prefs = new Properties();
>> > prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length", "25");
>> >
>> >
>> > prefs.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.new_lines_at_javadoc_boundaries",
>> > "false");
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Em 24 de fev de 2017 06:07, "Luca Burgazzoli" <lburgazzoli at gmail.com>
>> > escreveu:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I'm doing some small experiments with Forge Roaster and I'm unable to
>> >> get some formatting options taken into account.
>> >>
>> >> My code and the result is here:
>> >> https://gist.github.com/lburgazzoli/115377c3887972696f77db3a71fef85f
>> >>
>> >> As you can notice, I configured some properties so that the code
>> >> should wrap at column 120 and it should use spaces instead of tabs but
>> >> my setup is ignored and the resulting code is still formatted with
>> >> some defaults.
>> >>
>> >> Am I doing something wrong ?
>> >>
>> >> Thx,
>> >> Luca
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> Luca Burgazzoli
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> forge-users mailing list
>> >> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > forge-users mailing list
>> > forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-users mailing list
>> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-users mailing list
> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users

From forge-users at lists.jboss.org  Tue Feb 28 03:05:01 2017
From: forge-users at lists.jboss.org (rh)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:05:01 -0000
Subject: [forge-users] =?utf-8?b?Zm9yZ2UtdXNlcnPvvJrkurrlipvotYTmupDmlYg=?=
	=?utf-8?b?6IO95pa556iL5byPIDg2MTAw?=
Message-ID: <20160229152857343608@cuvziu.org>

?????????
?????? 2017?3?10-11?? 4?14,15??? 6?9,10??? 


?????? 4980?/??????????????????? 

?????? HR????????????????????????????? 

?????? ???? + ???? + ???? +???? + ???? + ???? 

?????? 021-31006787, 13381601000 (???) 

?QQ/ ??? 320588808 
??????
1??????HR??????????
2??????????????????
3??????HR??????HR??????HR??????
4??????HR??????????
5??????????HR?????????????

??????
1?HR?????????????????????????????????
2?HR?????????????????????????????
3?HR?????????????????????????????????
4?HR??????????????????????????KPI?????
5?HR?????????????????????????

?????
??1?HR?????
??2??????????
??3???????HR????
??4?HR???????
??5??????
??6? HR???

??????
??1????????HR??????
??2????????HR??????
??3??????????HR??????
??4??????????HR???
??5????????HR??????
??6?????????????

??????
???? ?????HR?????????????0.5???
??????HR????
??????HR????
??1?HR?????

???? HR??? ??????? 2.5??+?????2???
?????
???HR?????????-??1?????????????
??2??????????
????1????????HR??????
???HR????????
????2????????HR??????
??2????????????????
?????
???????????HR??????????
????????HR????????????
1?HR??????????
????3??????????HR??????
2????HR??????????????
????4??????????HR???
?????????HR????????????????????
??3????ROE?28.6%???9.82%???????????????HR?????????
??5????????HR??????

???? HR??????????2??+?????2???
?????
???HR??????HR???????
?IT??????????39%???8%???????55%?
??4????????????????3??
???HR??????HR???????
1?HR????????????????????????
??5?????????8.3%????9.2%???????????????????????

2??????????
??4? HR???????
?????
???HR????
1????????????????5?---???????????
2?KPI?????????????
3????????????????
???HR????

???? HR??????????1.5???????????????
?????
???HR??
??6?HR??????????
???????
??5??????

?????
??7??????????????????50%????????80%????????20%?
???? HR"?"?????????1.5???
?????HR???
??6? HR???

???????? 
?????????????
?????????????????
???????????????? 
?????????????
??????????????
????Bel Fuse Inc.??????????????
????500????????????
???????????????

???? 
???20??HR??????????????????????????500????????500??????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????IPO????????????????????????
?????????????????????HR??????????????????HR?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????HR????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????smart??????????
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170228/19a6f50d/attachment.html 

From cmoullia at redhat.com  Tue Feb 28 04:50:05 2017
From: cmoullia at redhat.com (Charles Moulliard)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:50:05 +0100
Subject: [forge-users] Is this page still up to date :
	https://forge.jboss.org/document/test-your-addon
Message-ID: <CAPb1sSuMXQaFgGrGCDnQTDN3AA6+=LedqmFsByc3eWzM0yK7Sw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I'm developing some tests cases for the Spring Boot Forge Addon [1] and I'm
wondering if this page is still up to date [2] to start to learn and create
a JBoss Forge test case ?

[1] : https://github.com/forge/springboot-addon
[2] : https://forge.jboss.org/document/test-your-addon

Regards,

Charles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170228/338f2c9d/attachment.html 

From ggastald at redhat.com  Tue Feb 28 09:05:16 2017
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:05:16 -0300
Subject: [forge-users] Is this page still up to date :
	https://forge.jboss.org/document/test-your-addon
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJg=aSybE0fXBF-DDdBxOVGrZ=UvD2aHsy_RqKbzAq1zvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPb1sSuMXQaFgGrGCDnQTDN3AA6+=LedqmFsByc3eWzM0yK7Sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJhif6xn-71USN_2GeTGn4y68PBqUyZgwojzy_Yie8LvtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJg=aSybE0fXBF-DDdBxOVGrZ=UvD2aHsy_RqKbzAq1zvw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJgZDy31vDAfVGWd1+JDawW+9W8_xRQhVdbsuoQKW2Y5tQ@mail.gmail.com>

Ah good catch, it is not. You just need to add @RunWith(Arquillian.class)
and you're all set.
I'll update that page. Thanks!

Em 28 de fev de 2017 06:50, "Charles Moulliard" <cmoullia at redhat.com>
escreveu:

Hi,

I'm developing some tests cases for the Spring Boot Forge Addon [1] and I'm
wondering if this page is still up to date [2] to start to learn and create
a JBoss Forge test case ?

[1] : https://github.com/forge/springboot-addon
[2] : https://forge.jboss.org/document/test-your-addon

Regards,

Charles

_______________________________________________
forge-users mailing list
forge-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20170228/08233daa/attachment.html