[gatein-dev] [GateIn] Roll back revision 744 on identity & bug in jcr-core.

[Dimitri BAELI]

I'm late to commit the use of
    https://svn.jboss.org/repos/gatein/tools/packager  (This one seems the
latest, and being worked on - not used in packaging/pkg)
    I'm doing it now
Dimitri BAELI - eXo Platform SAS


On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Marko Strukelj <marko.strukelj at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> There are 2 extra things to do:
>
> 1) Separate mc-integration code in its own module, so that container module
> has no dependencies on mc-kernel artifacts.
> This will require an additional reflection style invocation in one place,
> but should not be a problem to do.
>
> 2) Add xml file configuration for marking certain components to use
> mc-interception even though they are not marked as @InterceptMC
> This will allow us to externally configure to mc-intercept components that
> are part of exo-kernel and GateIn. We won't annotate these components in
> advance. Application developers who want to integrate with their existing
> mc-beans components will still use @InterceptMC. XML configuration will
> override annotations.
>
> I'm also working on release part of this. What's the status of exopackage
> ATM?
>
> http://svn.exoplatform.org/projects/utils/exopackage  (This one is
> actually used in portal packaging/pkg)
> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/gatein/portal/trunk/packaging/exopackage (???)
> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/gatein/tools/packager  (This one seems the
> latest, and being worked on - not used in packaging/pkg)
>
> I have some changes in:
>
> javascript/eXo/command/exobuild.js
>   - introduced --integration-test option
>
> javascript/eXo/server/JbossEar.js
>   - introduced jbossas specific dependencies - only if --integration-test
> option is on
>
> javascript/eXo/projects/Product.js
>   - added 'integrationTests' flag to elegantly communicate
> --integration-test flag from exobuild.js to JbossEar.js
>
> I'd like to make a branch so that others can try this. Where would be the
> best place?
>
> Cheers,
>
> - marko
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Julien Viet <julien at julienviet.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I discussed with Marko last night late about how to improve his work and
>> he agreed to proceed this way.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Julien
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Thomas Heute wrote:
>>
>>  See Marko's email of the 17th, can we commit this into kernel before it
>> gets released ?
>> It has been month since Marko is trying to get attention on the MC
>> integration with little success so far.
>>
>> Marko's changes aren't changing the way it works or interfering on
>> lifecycle it, it just add a way to inject MC beans into eXo Kernel.
>>
>> Thomas.
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/gatein-dev/attachments/20091124/9f534c5d/attachment.html