[gsoc] score for submission

Mircea Markus mircea.markus at gmail.com
Fri Apr 13 11:48:37 EDT 2012


Thank you!

On 13 Apr 2012, at 16:44, Anil Saldhana wrote:

> Mircea,
>    I will look at how the proposal got a low rating.  
> 
> Regards,
> Anil
> 
> On 04/13/2012 10:30 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>> 
>> Guys, 
>> 
>> I've had an 1h long chat with this guys Sunimal and he's a very sharp and committed person. I personally feel that it's very unfair for his effort and involvement to be rated the way it is. So would it be possible for the author of the evaluation to ping me offline to have a chat on that?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Mircea 
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/sunimalr/1
>> 
>> On 12 Apr 2012, at 14:07, Mircea Markus wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I've been reviewing some infinispan submissions to GSoC and two[1][2] of them are rated with the minimal score (1/5). 
>>> I'm very surprised by that rating, especially in the case of [1] which is a solid submission with a good level of detail.
>>> I know the rating is anonymous, but I'd really appreciate some details on why both submissions were rated like that.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mircea
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/sunimalr/1
>>> [2] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/anton_kovalyov/1
>> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> gsoc mailing list
> gsoc at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/gsoc/attachments/20120413/ec61b76e/attachment.html 


More information about the gsoc mailing list