[Hawkular-dev] Should Keycloak integration be optional?

[Heiko Braun]

Several questions: 

Does keycloak support other auth mechanisms that don't build on http?

Does keycloak limit the reuse of hawkular components?

Does keycloak have a desirable out-of-the-box experience? (Read addtional setup costs)






> Am 04.02.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Thomas Segismont <tsegismo at redhat.com>:
> 
> Le 30/01/2015 12:22, Thomas Heute a écrit :
>>> When you install InfluxDB, carbon/whisper, opentsdb, you don't need to
>>> install an identity management server, period.
>> 
>> They are also not multi-tenant solutions AFAIK. I don't see Metrics
>> competing with the solution mentioned, actually we looked into those to
>> use as underlying solution.
>> 
> 
> To me, it doesn't matter if the team doesn't put all its efforts in 
> maintaining a standalone metrics distribution. But it does matter to 
> enable and help re-use outside of our principal use case (the hawkular 
> suite), because we'd miss important feedback/bug reports/contributions 
> from the community.
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev