[Hawkular-dev] WF 9 upgrade

[Thomas Heute]

My understanding is that the agent would work with WF8 and WF9, but indeed with WF8 we "lose" some metrics.

While we'll need to keep some consistency between server screens, we'll also have differences (Tomcat/JWS, Fuse...).

I hope we don't have to duplicate all  but hide/show parts of the screens depending on the server type/version.

Thomas




On 06/18/2015 08:22 PM, Alexandre Mendonca wrote:
> Regarding the fact that we need to upgrade to WF9 to get more data from it.. does it means that Hawkular will only be "compatible" with WF9+ ?
>
> Because for instance, I'm thinking on the Web Metrics screen, with WF8 we can't (in a very sane way) get the data we need to fill it as we will be able with WF9. So it will work fine with the local server, since it will be WF9, but what if a WF8 server is added to be monitored, how do we display that same data ? Do we need server type specific screens ? This should also apply to other metrics screens regarding other server types (that we might support in the future).
>
> Alexandre
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Heute" <theute at redhat.com>
> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 June, 2015 8:08:19 AM
> Subject: [Hawkular-dev] WF 9 upgrade
>
>
> We have to upgrade to WF9 to get more data out of WF9.
>
> there are quite some changes to be made:
>     - Parent declares the version of WF to use and BOM:
>     here is my branch:
> https://github.com/theute/hawkular-parent-pom/commits/HAWKULAR-244
>     - Accounts need to upgrade to KC 1.3 (to be released this week)
>     Juca will work on this
>     - Bus/Nest needs to adapt
>     here is my branch
> https://github.com/theute/hawkular-bus/tree/HAWKULAR-232 (needs another
> patch from Mazz)
>     - Agent also needs some changes.
>
> WF 9 GA is supposed to go out at any point now, let's try to coordinate
> around that, if you have a release pending, think of that.
>
> BTW, I tried to reflect the dependencies between component, would have
> been easier if everyone could respect our standards, in particular:
>     - declare all dependencies at the root pom
>     - use <version./groupid/> in pom properties.
> So please fix this if you do not follow those basic rules.
>
> PS: for the upstream project, it is ok if all dependencies don't fully
> align, for instance 2 components could depend on 2 different versions of
> the parent.
>
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>