[Hawkular-dev] the name of our hawkular agent/wildfly monitor/feed is confusing - I'm fixing it

[Lukas Krejci]

So does this mean the "feeds" in inventory should be renamed to "agents", too?

I thought that we wanted to move away from using the word agent but frankly I 
don't care too much.

On Monday, November 02, 2015 10:06:13 Thomas Heute wrote:
> +1
> 
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:02 AM, John Mazzitelli <mazz at redhat.com> wrote:
> > As I'm writing code and docs and javadocs all around, I realize that the
> > name of our "agent" is utterly confused. We need to fix this or we will
> > eventually confuse users/customers.
> > 
> > Right now in code, or comments, or docs, or just in talking, the names of
> > the "agent" have been at one time or another:
> > 
> > agent
> > wildfly monitor
> > wildfly hawkular feed
> > wildfly monitor agent
> > wildfly extension
> > wildfly agent module
> > wildfly agent
> > etc. etc. etc.
> > 
> > Over the weekend, I'm going to start renaming this so it is consistent
> > across the board.
> > 
> > It will be called "Hawkular WildFly Agent"
> > 
> > This will affect maven artifact names moving forward. But we need to fix
> > this now, because its confusing ME. I can only imagine the confusion when
> > people start to ask "what do you call the hawkular thing that monitors
> > Wildfly?"
> > _______________________________________________
> > hawkular-dev mailing list
> > hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev