[Hawkular-dev] Proposal: introduce DependencyConvergence enforcer rule

[Thomas Segismont]

Le 25/11/2015 10:04, Peter Palaga a écrit :
> On 2015-11-25 09:18, Thomas Segismont wrote:
>> >I'm fine with adding the rule as long as it's possible to deactivate it
>> >at the module level if needed (with serious justification).
> I am frankly failing to conceive of an acceptable justification to
> disable the rule for some module.
>

So am I. But more often than not rules need exceptions.

> I think that the only legal way to fix any violations of the rule should
> be to exclude one of the conflicting artifacts (with all the known
> pitfalls - seehttp://stackoverflow.com/a/16239482  )

I agree, properly excluding the conflicting dependency is the right move 
for this type of problem.