[Hawkular-dev] Any objections to using gitbooks?

[Thomas Heute]

I mostly have concerns about having docs spread over multiple solutions.
But if the plan is to move all to gitbook, it should be ok.

Also we should still use AsciiDoc (I see that gitbook supports AscissDoc
and Markdown)

Thomas

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Wondering if gitbooks was ever considered for the documentation? Seems
> ideal as we can version each book with the component(s) it relates to, and
> users can download a pdf version for use offline.
>
> Was thinking about experimenting with it for the updated APM docs?
>
> Any objections?
>
> Regards
> Gary
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160606/2e32ed5a/attachment.html