[Hawkular-dev] MiQ log/middleware.log

Thomas Heute theute at redhat.com
Thu Oct 13 01:24:51 EDT 2016


On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:36 AM, mike thompson <mithomps at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 7:18 PM, mike thompson <mithomps at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> So currently, we aren’t  really logging anything to this middleware.log
> (as far as I can tell). Should we be? What is our policy around using this
> log (versus evm.log)?
> This may be more important once we are in CFME and have to debug some
> customer issues.
>
> Should all of our logging goto this log? Should some? If so what?
>
> Sorry, just a bit confused about the purpose of this log since it shows
> empty for me.
>
>
> Seems to me we should be using it more. Since it much easier and relevant
> to look through this than the huge evm.log (which has also has worker
> thread traces every X seconds as well).
>

Same here, any idea how/when/by whom it was introduced ?

Thomas



>
>
>
> — Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20161013/77a034d5/attachment.html 


More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list