[hibernate-dev] jpa api jar name

[Emmanuel Bernard]

javax.persistence is owned by "Sun" as spec lead. 
And more concretely, they don't publish the spec jars to maven repos under an open source license. So our lawyers asked us to use a clean code.

Emmanuel

On 14 déc. 2009, at 11:18, Sanne Grinovero wrote:

> out of curiosity, why not drop org.hibernate?
> javax.persistence:jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> 
> are there more api vendors ?
> 
> Cheers,
> Sanne
> 
> 2009/12/14 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>:
>> I would use
>> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>> 
>> Because while there is code written by us, it's not specific to Hibernate and can bootstrap all providers on the market.
>> 
>> On 11 déc. 2009, at 22:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> 
>>> Of course that should be
>>> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> 
>>> ;)
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:59 -0600, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>>> I think there is a consensus we need to rename our JPA api jar.  The
>>>> main concern is that we should be capturing the spec version in the
>>>> artifact name but that the versioning should be its own thing since
>>>> there is in fact Hibernate specific code in the classes that we will
>>>> have need to maintain and release independently.
>>>> 
>>>> I propose the following naming:
>>>> org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.1-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>> 
>>>> Unless I hear different options I will make this change this weekend.
>>>> 
>>>> At that time I will also publish a release of it as 1.0.0-CR-1
>>>> 
>>> --
>>> Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
>>> Hibernate.org
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>