[hibernate-dev] Simultaneously Supporting JDBC3 and JDBC4 with Maven

[Emmanuel Bernard]

So some databases can't be accessed from JDK 6? That sucks.
I guess the question is from the people that can't go for JDK 6 / JDBC  
4, how many are willing to move to the next version of Hibernate anyway.
If it's a small minority, we should move on. If not then we need to  
hack around :(

On 22 sept. 09, at 19:36, Steve Ebersole wrote:

> JDBC 4 is JDK 1.6, correct.
>
> Because not all deployment environments support jdk 1.6 nor do all  
> jdbc
> drivers support jdbc 4
>
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 19:07 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> Actually naive question.
>> JDBC 4 is JDK 6 right. Since JDK 5 is EOLed at the end of this month,
>> Why don't we just stop JDBC 3 support altogether?
>>
>> On 22 sept. 09, at 18:19, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> from how I understand Maven, swallow it and go for 2.
>>>
>>> On 21 sept. 09, at 20:53, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://in.relation.to/12371.lace
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
>>>> Hibernate.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> -- 
> Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
> Hibernate.org
>