[hibernate-dev] Hibernate4 artifact names, Persistence provider name, maven...

Emmanuel Bernard emmanuel at hibernate.org
Mon Jul 18 04:39:56 EDT 2011


You can use org.hibernate.Version.getVersionString()
which is the version number + qualifier OR [WORKING] when a snapshot is used.

Emmanuel

On 16 juil. 2011, at 19:56, Scott Marlow wrote:

> It doesn't cause me great pain to not have this, would just make a few 
> AS integration tasks simpler (when dealing with multiple versions of 
> Hibernate).
> 
> I understand that there are more environments than just AS.  For AS7, it 
> was more because I am using the persistence provider class name as a key 
> (in a hash map).  I really should be using a composite key that includes 
> a version number but I don't have one (maybe I should look for one 
> inside the persistence provider jar and use the version information if 
> found).
> 
> On 07/16/2011 01:07 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> I am personally against this idea.  You mention renaming one single
>> class, but in reality we would need different FQNs for each and every
>> class otherwise we run into a clash in the class loader as to which one
>> wins (the one from hibernate4 jar or the one from hibernate3 jar).
>> 
>> This is a bad path to start down.
>> 
>> As an illustration, we had the same issue with JBoss Cache for some
>> time and we simply had 2 sub-projects, one for each version.  Which in
>> my mind is the perfectly reasonable approach.
>> 
>> On Fri 15 Jul 2011 08:55:23 AM CDT, Scott Marlow wrote:
>>> If someone wanted to include both Hibernate 3 + Hibernate 4 in the same
>>> project, that might be easier if the Hibernate 4 artifacts had a version
>>> number in it or was changed for every new major release.  I don't think
>>> Maven supports building two versions of the same artifact (at the same
>>> dependency level).
>>> 
>>> For the persistence provider name,
>>> org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence, I'm wondering if we could have a
>>> org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence4 in addition, that could be used
>>> to uniquely reference Hibernate 4.x persistence providers.
>>> 
>>> I assume this is too late in the Hibernate 4 cycle to change, but wanted
>>> to bring the idea up.
>>> 
>>> Changing the artifact names would impact other projects that depends on
>>> Hibernate4 and would need to sync up with the changes as well.
>>> 
>>> What do you think?
>>> 
>>> Scott
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev




More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list