[hibernate-dev] Deprecating or removing entirely HashtableCacheProvider?

[Emmanuel Bernard]

Moving it to the hibernate-testing module seems like a good idea to me.

On 8 juin 2011, at 15:02, Steve Ebersole wrote:

> The only use case I am really interested in for "simple map based" caching is the test suite.  Its the whole reason I did not do the things Strong and I discussed on the other thread already.
> 
> Perhaps we move "simple map based" caching impl to the hibernate-testing module?  The the test suite can continue to use it but we have explicitly published the intent.
> 
> And yes I totally agree that we should be driving folks to proper cache integrations, namely the infinispan and/or ehcache integrations.  The others (oscache, swarmcache, etc) have been removed already.
> 
> 
> On 06/08/2011 07:26 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> I always try to understand what's the main reason motivating people to
>> use it. Likely the zero dependencies, "let's just try one" ?
>> 
>> We could bake a very simple implementation based as you say on a
>> ConcurrentHashMap, and implement a simple eviction is simple. But I'm
>> afraid that offering such a feature would drive away from proper
>> implementations, which we should encourage to use.
>> 
>> Sanne
>> 
>> 2011/6/8 Emmanuel Bernard<emmanuel at hibernate.org>:
>>> I always die a little when I see someone using HashtableCacheProvider.
>>> 
>>> What do you think of removing it entirely. Worse case, we could provide an implementation that is backed by ConcurrentHashMap but even with that, we would get no eviction policy etc.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> 
> -- 
> Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
> http://hibernate.org