[hibernate-dev] Are you support specification?

[Emmanuel Bernard]

My bad the code nagivating the data at stake is the W3C DOM API. Not sure why I had JAXB in mind.

On 3 mai 2012, at 14:50, Steve Ebersole wrote:

> All JAXB stuff is slated for 5.0.  No current code uses JAXB that I am aware of.
> 
> On Thu 03 May 2012 07:40:08 AM CDT, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> it's actually probable because JAXB - which is what we use I think - is such a pain in the neck for these kind of situations.
>> 
>> On 3 mai 2012, at 14:38, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> 
>>> It's expected that people that exclude use
>>> 
>>>    <exclude-unlisted-classes/>
>>> 
>>> and people that do not want to exclude simply don't add this element.
>>> 
>>> It's possible that our parsing does not account for people that use the explicit form to not exclude. Open a JIRA issue please.
>>> 
>>> On 3 mai 2012, at 14:12, Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi, guys,
>>>> 
>>>> I noticed that hibernate excludes unlisted classes even if
>>>> *<exclude-unlisted-classes>* is set to *false*.
>>>> Here is the text from persistence-2_0-final-spec.pdf:
>>>> 
>>>> /8.2.1.6 mapping-file, jar-file, class, exclude-unlisted-classes
>>>> The following classes must be implicitly or explicitly denoted as
>>>> managed persistence classes to be
>>>> included within a persistence unit: entity classes; embeddable classes;
>>>> mapped superclasses.
>>>> The set of managed persistence classes that are managed by a persistence
>>>> unit is defined by using one or
>>>> more of the following:
>>>> [81]
>>>> . Annotated managed persistence classes contained in the root of the
>>>> persistence unit (*unless the
>>>> exclude-unlisted-classes element is specified*) /
>>>> ....
>>>> 
>>>> /8.2.1.6.1 Annotated Classes in the Root of the Persistence Unit
>>>> All classes contained in the root of the persistence unit are searched
>>>> for annotated managed persistence
>>>> classes---classes with the
>>>> Entity,
>>>> Embeddable, or
>>>> MappedSuperclass annotation---and any
>>>> mapping metadata annotations found on these classes will be processed,
>>>> or they will be mapped using
>>>> the mapping annotation defaults. If it is not intended that the
>>>> annotated persistence classes contained in
>>>> the root of the persistence unit be included in the persistence unit, the
>>>> *exclude-unlisted-classes element must be specified as **true*. The
>>>> exclude-unlisted-classes element is not intended for use in Java SE
>>>> environments./
>>>> 
>>>> Does this mean you don't support specification in this place?
>>>> 
>>>> Here is a link to our jira issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11773
>>>> 
>>>> Dmitry
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> 
> --
> steve at hibernate.org
> http://hibernate.org