[hibernate-dev] Documentation on OGM + JBoss AS
Sanne Grinovero
sanne at hibernate.org
Mon Oct 1 18:21:23 EDT 2012
You don't have to build it but having it in the cache woud help :)
The test is building and materializing an AS7 module on the filesystem
containing all dependencies, including Hibernate Search (among others)
and uses ShrinkWrap to do that; if you look in the test you should
find a line which forces it to stay offline (as it was massively slow
otherwise), you should comment that line at least once so that it
downloads all what it needs.
On 1 October 2012 19:39, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 12:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>
>> On 1 October 2012 17:08, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/01/2012 11:05 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1 October 2012 15:51, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I got further yesterday (after removing the ---PlaceHolderDSForOGM---
>>>>> property from HibernateOgmPersistence). Not sure what the long term
>>>>> change is (perhaps we should only add the ---PlaceHolderDSForOGM--- for
>>>>> the non-container case).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice. Is the AS still "mandating" a specific module name and injecting
>>>> Hibernate 3?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The OGM module name should be org.hibernate:ogm. The org.hibernate:ogm
>>> module should depend on Hibernate 4 (org.hibernate:main) and Hibernate 4
>>> should depend on OGM.
>>
>>
>> I'm still not understanding why we need to hardcode a constant module
>> name for the OGM provider, that's unintuitive and brought me a lot of
>> pain when trying to use a *different* version, when recently trying
>> out your instructions.
>>
>> I might want to deploy OGM using a different version of Hibernate ORM
>> than what I have in another OGM-using application; also it is very
>> likely that soon OGM will require a version which is not the one
>> bundled in the AS.
>>
>> I would expect the module to be something I can configure in my own
>> application:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/Sanne/ogm-kitchensink/blob/as711/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>
>> it should be possible to use a different module name, how could I deal
>> with multiple deployments otherwise? The AS should not mandate the
>> module dependency, at best it could take some hint like you do with
>> the _jboss.as.jpa.adapterModule_ property
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/Sanne/ogm-kitchensink/blob/as711/.openshift/config/modules/org/hibernate/ogm/module.xml
>>
>> I didn't need any datasource, this worked fine:
>>
>> https://github.com/Sanne/ogm-kitchensink/blob/as711/src/main/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml
>
>
> I tried building https://github.com/Sanne/ogm-kitchensink (as711 branch)
> locally but got an error:
>
> Caused by: org.sonatype.aether.resolution.ArtifactResolutionException: The
> repository system is offline but the artifact
> org.hibernate:hibernate-search-orm:jar:4.1.1.Final is not available in the
> local repository.
>
> Do I need to build search locally to use this example?
>
>
>>
>> Sanne
>>
>>>> Last time I was trying that was driving me nuts, as to workaround it I
>>>> needed lots of changes in AS.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We should either create a blog update to explain this or as previously
>>> discussed on this thread, document the changes needed.
>>>
>>> http://pastie.org/4891854 is my current persistence.xml that I'm testing
>>> with.
>>>
>>> I had to set jboss.as.jpa.adapterModule to org.jboss.as.jpa.hibernate:4,
>>> so
>>> that we would use the Hibernate 4 integration code with OGM.
>>>
>>> I also had to set jboss.as.jpa.classtransformer to false so that we
>>> wouldn't
>>> try to create the EntityManagerFactory too soon (should probably verify
>>> if
>>> that is still needed).
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would expect to not have any OGM-specific code in the AS, but that
>>>> it should be good enough to implement the JPA spec correctly regarding
>>>> the provider implementation?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I sometimes hear that question (why don't you just use the JPA spec
>>> bootstrapping). However, we are allowed by the JPA specification, to
>>> pass a
>>> map of integration properties when calling the
>>>
>>> PersistenceProvider.createContainerEntityManagerFactory(PersistenceUnitInfo,
>>> Map integrationProperties) call. Sometimes, the persistence providers
>>> include enough version specific application server integration code, so
>>> that
>>> app servers find that its good enough to just call the JPA spec
>>> invocation
>>> but in practice this breaks when the app servers change too much.
>>>
>>> For AS7, I created persistence provider adapters that (optionally)
>>> contain
>>> the extra integration code that is not handled by the JPA specification.
>>> For AS 8.0, I want to change the relationship between the persistence
>>> provider adapters and providers to be less tightly coupled (its currently
>>> a
>>> 1-1) but they make developing JPA applications for AS7 easier for the
>>> developer (fewer properties have to be passed in).
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pastie.org/4891549 is the out from running one of the example
>>>>> applications (jboss-javaee6-webapp). Obviously, I need to try a
>>>>> different test. ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right, you might need to simplify an existing test, or take the
>>>> ogm-kitchensink as a starting point:
>>>> take branch as711 from:
>>>> git://github.com/Sanne/ogm-kitchensink.git
>>>>
>>>> Hardy originally wrote that demo, but I don't remember if we ever
>>>> integrated my changes from that branch to have it run on AS 7.1.1.
>>>>
>>>>> For AS documentation, I'm not sure if we are ready to add that yet (it
>>>>> would be experimental with the goal of helping someone get started).
>>>>> I'm open to suggestions but I think we could build on what I blogged
>>>>> about last year here
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/UsingADifferentPersistenceProviderWithAS701#H-ExperimentalUseOfOGMOnAS701.
>>>>>
>>>>> - How to add the OGM module to AS
>>>>> - Changing existing AS module dependencies for OGM
>>>>> - Infinispan Configuration changes for OGM
>>>>> - Example
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That would be great, are you creating a patch for the docbook in OGM?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I created a git branch locally but haven't started the actual doc changes
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sanne
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/27/2012 11:13 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd still prefer a small section in our reference documentation.
>>>>>> Stuff in the wiki is as useful as peeing in a violin as we say in
>>>>>> France ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu 2012-09-27 9:52, Scott Marlow wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/27/2012 09:02 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Scott,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I stumbled upon https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/OGM-117 and
>>>>>>>> wondered
>>>>>>>> if you could contribute a paragraph or two on how to use Hibernate
>>>>>>>> OGM
>>>>>>>> in JBoss AS latest.
>>>>>>>> The documentation is hosted in
>>>>>>>> http://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm, there
>>>>>>>> is a documentation module.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could do that or
>>>>>>> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS72/JPA+Reference+Guide might
>>>>>>> be another place for the "how to use Hibernate OGM with AS"
>>>>>>> documentation. This link is likely to change like the wind but the
>>>>>>> content will be available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure that either location is better, but I do like using
>>>>>>> confluence as users can more easily fix the mistakes. ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have a preference?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can make it by end of week or Monday, you gain extra karma
>>>>>>>> points.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Extra karma points are always good to have! :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
More information about the hibernate-dev
mailing list