[hibernate-dev] [hibernate-hql-parser] 1.0.0.Alpha3 released

[Sanne Grinovero]

That issue was indeed unrelated, this is what caused trouble:
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1355

I upgraded the dependency in Infinispan:
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/2006

Cheers,
Sanne

On 14 August 2013 18:10, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org> wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> we don't have an ETA for that specific issue as the user who
> originally proposed the issue on the forum didn't provide a full test.
> I think I have an idea of what could be happening, but it seems very
> hard to forge a unit test which could really reproduce it, and I don't
> think we'll want to fix that in Hibernate Search 4.x anyway as it
> would break current mappings.
>
> So I tried to upgrade the Hibernate Search code in Infinispan Query to
> check what you're talking about, and indeed I get exceptions with a
> similar message but I don't think HSEARCH-1318 is related, I'm not
> sure yet what is exactly happening but it's definitely not a mapping
> circularity problem. I'll let you know.
>
> -- Sanne
>
> On 14 August 2013 16:26, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org> wrote:
>> Adrian,
>>
>> Do you happen to have an isolated test case which shows that issue? This
>> would help me in analyzing the issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Gunnar
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/8/14 Adrian Nistor <anistor at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot guys!
>>>
>>> So far everything works fine with your latest fixes in hql parser. There
>>> is however that issue in hibernate-search 4.4.0.Alpha1 that prevents us to
>>> integrate this in master right now because too many of infinispan-query
>>> tests would fail (due to
>>> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1318). Do you have an ETA for
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/13/2013 11:17 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/8/13 Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
>>>>
>>>> @Gunnar I've included your last pull, tagged it and uploaded it already.
>>>
>>>
>>> Awesome Sanne, thanks.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've sent a pull to OGM including your tests and more tests to verify
>>>> the LIKE behavior; I think they are quite comprehensive and are
>>>> passing, but if you are able to add more failing ones please send them
>>>> to me :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, will check it out tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No changes where needed, it just worked fine. I suspect you didn't
>>>> take case sensitivity in consideration when trying? It is case
>>>> sensitive, and should not be applied on analyzed fields.
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought I used correct casing, but it might be I got it wrong. Either
>>> way nice that it's working! Thanks for checking it out and adding more
>>> tests.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Adrian, this should contain all the fixes you needed; if not we don't
>>>> mind making more releases soon.
>>>
>>>
>>> Right, just let us/me know in case you need anything more.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Sanne
>>>
>>>
>>> --Gunnar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>