[hibernate-dev] Create OSGi integration test project for all of Hibernate?

Steve Ebersole steve at hibernate.org
Fri Dec 13 10:27:58 EST 2013


Well the discussion of disabling the tests completely grew from the 
fact that the tests as they are are not stable.  Inconsequential 
changes would often cause them to fail.  Thats why I qualified my 
response with "Of course this means making these tests stable" ;)

In general I am not a fan of having code in one repo and then having 
its tests in another repo.  We can have comprehensive tests in another 
repo, thats fine.  But the project that defines the code should at 
least have basic "it works" testing.


On Fri 13 Dec 2013 09:06:04 AM CST, Brett Meyer wrote:
> Our current Arquillian-based test in hibernate-osgi demonstrates:
>
> 1.) the core/em/osgi and client bundles started
> 2.) SF/EMF can be created through the OSGi services
> 3.) basic CRUD
> 4.) our internal extension points registered themselves through OSGi blueprint services and core discovered them (ex: Envers' Integrator)
> 5.) core discovered extension point services registered by the client bundle (Integrator, TypeContributor, StrategyRegistration)
>
> That provides somewhat adequate coverage of typical issues presented by the OSGi environment.  I'm completely fine with leaving those there (and prefer to).  Steve, I originally brought this up due to past discussions about disabling the tests entirely.
>
> Regardless, there are certainly more "advanced" integration tests, matrices, etc. that could be demonstrated through a new combined project and CI job.
>
> Brett Meyer
> Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve at hibernate.org>
> To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer at redhat.com>, "Emmanuel Bernard" <emmanuel at hibernate.org>, "Gunnar Morling" <gunnar at hibernate.org>
> Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 9:54:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Create OSGi integration test project for all of Hibernate?
>
> I think it sounds great... in theory.  But I believe you will hit the
> matrix problem Emmanuel discusses.
>
> However, I also want to make sure we are not removing "smoke tests" from
> the projects themselves.  I don't care what you call them: smoke tests,
> integration tests, unit tests, regression tests, etc. But there needs to
> be tests in ORM (for example) that ensure that basic OSGi functionality
> is not broken when we make changes.  More importantly, these tests are
> needed for contributors so they can verify that they are not breaking
> something when they make changes. Expecting them to check out some
> "other project" for "full testing" is simply unreasonable.  Of course
> this means making these tests stable.
>
> On 12/13/2013 08:40 AM, Brett Meyer wrote:
>> Exactly.  And the matrix can become even more complicated if we attempt multiple instances/versions of our bundles and client bundles.
>>
>> Gunnar, what are your thoughts, since Validator already has a PAX EXAM test?
>>
>> Brett Meyer
>> Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Emmanuel Bernard" <emmanuel at hibernate.org>
>> To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 2:48:23 AM
>> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Create OSGi integration test project for all of Hibernate?
>>
>> This sounds like a good idea. You will hit the more general problem of the compatibility matrix and snapshot against snapshot issue we need to address to avoid the micro version incompatibilities that have hit Search and ORM recently.
>>
>>> On 12 déc. 2013, at 19:29, Brett Meyer <brmeyer at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ORM currently uses Arquillian to test hibernate-osgi (and afaik Validator does the same).  Since at least ORM, Validator, and Search have moved or are moving towards supporting OSGi environments, would it make more sense to create hibernate/hibernate-osgi-integration-tests and wire it to a new CI job?  Arguably, they shouldn't be considered a "unit test" to begin with, but that's up for debate.  Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Brett Meyer
>>> Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>


More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list